None
I went to the interview, but no one received me at all. The company didn’t even have a reception desk. After finally finding someone passing by on my own, I was led into the meeting room.
The interview was with the CEO, who first made me wait 15 minutes to assert authority. During the interview, he was using his computer from start to finish. The interview lasted about 40 minutes, but he looked at me for less than 5 minutes in total. The impression was extremely poor.
After the interview, the CEO hurriedly left, and no one came to follow up. I simply walked out of the company on my own (???). There was no further response afterward. Even when I inquired through 104, they did not provide any acknowledgment or reply. Not knowing the interview result was very troubling for the interviewee.
I have rarely had such a poor interview experience. I received the interview invitation directly through 104. If anyone else receives one, I recommend not wasting your time on a company that shows such disrespect to interviewees.
None
The attitude of the interviewer in the final round was really terrible.
Although they were clearly hiring for an engineering position, they kept emphasizing that I didn’t have experience marketing products. On top of that, their tone was unpleasant, and it felt like I was being lectured.
What made me the angriest was that if the company was looking for engineers but genuinely cared about marketing experience as well, they could have made that clear in the first round of interviews. It was obvious from my résumé that I had no marketing experience, so they could have simply rejected me and saved both sides time.
After making it to the third interview, they only brought up this reason—seriously...? Did they think everyone had plenty of time? Or were they just looking for someone to lecture and use as a free outlet for their emotions?
All are drawbacks
The head of the customer service department is terrible and completely unfit for a management position. It would be bad enough if they only applied double standards to subordinates, but they are also suspected of workplace bullying and are extremely pretentious, leaving people speechless.
The department’s turnover rate is extremely high, yet they think that jobs are harder to find in southern Taiwan, so people are less likely to quit. Do they think people from southern Taiwan are all cheap slave labor?
There are no standard work procedures; management is entirely based on their mood. I advise everyone to run for the hills.
Everything is a drawback.
The customer service department supervisor is terrible and completely unfit for a management position. As if holding subordinates to double standards weren’t enough, they are also suspected of workplace bullying and are extremely affected, leaving people speechless.
The department’s turnover rate is extremely high, yet they think that because jobs are harder to find in southern Taiwan, employees are less likely to leave. Do they think people from the south are all cheap laborers or slaves?
There are no standard work procedures; everything is managed according to their mood. I advise everyone to get out quickly.
There are only drawbacks.
The customer service department supervisor is terrible and completely unfit for a management position. As if holding subordinates to double standards weren’t bad enough, they are also suspected of workplace bullying, and are extremely affected and insincere, leaving people speechless.
The department’s turnover rate is extremely high, yet they think that because jobs are harder to find in southern Taiwan, employees will be less likely to resign. Do they think people from southern Taiwan are all cheap laborers or something?
There are no standard work processes; everything is managed according to their mood. I urge all of you to get out quickly.
They are all drawbacks
The customer service department supervisor is terrible and completely unfit for a management position. Not only do they apply double standards to subordinates, but they are also suspected of workplace bullying, and are extremely affected and insufferable.
The department's turnover rate is extremely high, yet they think that because it is harder to find work in southern Taiwan, people will be less likely to quit. Do they think people from southern Taiwan are all cheap slave labor?
There is no standard work process; management is entirely based on their mood. I advise everyone to run as fast as you can.
Everything is a drawback.
The customer service department supervisor is terrible and completely unfit for a management position. Not only do they apply double standards to subordinates, they are also suspected of workplace bullying and are extremely affected and cringe-inducing.
The department’s turnover rate is extremely high, yet they think that because it is harder to find work in southern Taiwan, people are less likely to resign. Do they think people from southern Taiwan are all cheap laborers or slaves?
There are no standard work procedures; management is entirely based on their mood. I advise everyone to get out quickly.
Everything is a drawback
The customer service department supervisor is terrible and completely unfit for a management position. Not only do they hold subordinates to double standards, they are also suspected of workplace bullying, and are extremely pretentious and exasperating.
The department has an extremely high turnover rate, yet they think that because it is harder to find work in southern Taiwan, people will be less likely to resign. Do they think people from southern Taiwan are all cheap laborers or slaves?
There are no standardized work processes; management is entirely based on their mood. I advise all of you to escape while you can.
Everything is a drawback.
The head of the customer service department is terrible and completely unfit for a management position. Not only do they apply double standards to subordinates, they are also suspected of workplace bullying and are extremely affected, leaving people speechless.
The department's turnover rate is extremely high, yet they think that because jobs are harder to find in southern Taiwan, employees are less likely to leave. Do they think people from the south are all cheap slave labor?
There are no standard work procedures; management depends entirely on their mood. I advise everyone to run for the hills.
All cons
The customer service department manager is terrible and completely unfit for a management position. Not only do they apply double standards to subordinates, they are also suspected of workplace bullying and are extremely affected, leaving people speechless.
The department’s turnover rate is extremely high, yet they think that because jobs are harder to find in southern Taiwan, employees will be less likely to leave. Do they think people from southern Taiwan are all cheap laborers or slaves?
There is no standard work process; everything depends on the manager’s mood. I advise everyone to run.
There are only cons.
The customer service department supervisor is terrible and completely unfit for a management position. In addition to holding subordinates to double standards, they are also suspected of workplace bullying and are extremely affected, leaving people speechless.
The department's turnover rate is extremely high, yet they think that jobs are harder to find in southern Taiwan, so people are less likely to leave. Do they think people from southern Taiwan are all cheap laborers or slaves?
There are no standard work procedures; everything is managed according to their mood. I advise everyone to get out quickly.
All cons
The head of the customer service department is terrible and completely unfit for a management position. As if holding subordinates to double standards weren't bad enough, they are also suspected of workplace bullying and are extremely fake, leaving people speechless.
The department's turnover rate is extremely high, yet they think people in the south are less likely to quit because it's harder to find jobs there. Do they think southerners are all cheap slave labor?
There are no standardized work processes; everything is managed according to their mood. I urge everyone to get out quickly.
Everything is a drawback
The head of the customer service department is terrible and completely unfit for a management position. Setting double standards for subordinates would be bad enough, but they are also suspected of workplace bullying and are extremely affected and unbearable.
The department’s turnover rate is extremely high, yet they think that because jobs are harder to find in southern Taiwan, people are less likely to quit. Do they think people from southern Taiwan are all cheap slave labor?
There are no standardized work processes; management is entirely based on their mood. I advise everyone to get out quickly.
The outside restroom is very clean.
The keypad at the entrance says that interviewees should enter the extension number they were given, but when I entered it, it turned out to be an invalid number.
A passing employee eventually let me in.
The manager’s tone was fairly friendly, but instead of asking about my experience, they started investigating my online shopping habits,
and then even asked whether AI could do my job.
The whole thing was basically a fake interview.
Also, they were the ones who proactively contacted me for the interview... and even said there would definitely be a result within a week.
After about two weeks, they told me I had not passed their “selection process.”
But it’s probably just as well—their e-commerce system really does look outdated, like something from ten years ago.
Bottled water is provided.
The HR interview was friendly, and the job responsibilities were explained clearly.
The entrance is difficult to find.
The hiring manager had an extremely poor attitude and acted very arrogant.
During the entire interview, they made eye contact only briefly and kept typing on their laptop.
They said they were taking notes during the interview, but kept asking repetitive questions—what exactly were they recording??
They asked the job candidate to introduce themselves, but did not introduce the company or the position themselves.
Overall, it was a very unpleasant interview.
Really casual.
I really don't recommend it. They weren't very respectful toward the interviewee. The manager I met had absolutely no patience and kept shaking his leg, clearly wanting me to hurry up and finish talking, and he came across as looking down on people. I was completely stunned. The HR person was also very disorganized: they asked me to set aside time to interview for the first and second rounds together, but then the CEO conducting the second round wasn't available and told me to do only the first round for now. I had already set aside the time for them, and had even turned down online interviews with other companies. Then, after I passed the third round, they asked me to provide two references. In fact, I hadn't planned to join their company anyway because I'd heard the pay was very poor. In the end, nothing came of it~
The hiring manager was friendly during the interview, and the job responsibilities were explained clearly.
The first interview was very pleasant, and I successfully scheduled a second interview for a weekday evening. The second interview required a presentation; although we talked until quite late, it went smoothly and pleasantly. However, there was no follow-up afterward. After waiting a week, I proactively asked when I would receive the result but got no response. I waited another week and asked again, and was told that I was expected to be notified that Friday. Yet even now, I still have not received any response. This handling of the follow-up process is truly very disappointing.
There is water.
》The company’s office entrance is unclear, and there is no reception desk at all.
》Whether it was the first or second interview, after arriving on time, I had to wait one hour before the interview began.
》The CEO will directly close their eyes while speaking with you.
》During the interview, they kept asking about the previous company’s situation and practices, making it feel as though the purpose of the interview was to learn about another company rather than to recruit.
None
Interviewed for an accounting specialist position.
The HR was terrible. When I arrived at the company, no one received me at all. They didn’t even offer me water and simply threw a test paper at me before leaving.
When the supervisor responsible for the interview came later, her tone was very condescending and she seemed extremely impatient, as if everyone at your company owed her something and was wasting her time.
The test paper was also inexplicable.
Instead of conducting a hands-on Excel test, they asked candidates to recite functions from memory.
They wanted to test accounting entries, but the questions were also disorganized and poorly phrased.
None
I received an interview invitation, but afterward they completely ignored me. It left a very bad impression. Your company’s HR needs to improve.
Haven’t experienced any yet
I didn’t actively apply for this position, but I received an interview invitation email. The email said they had tried to contact me but couldn’t reach me. I checked all my contact methods and found no notification from them, so I replied to the invitation asking about available interview times:
They emailed me on 9/22, and I asked on 9/23 whether I could interview on 9/25. I didn’t receive a reply at all, even by 9/25. Before then, I kept preparing and checking my email in case the interview was going to happen.
They finally dragged things out until 10/5 to call me, asking about my understanding of the position and my work. I was completely dumbfounded. They proactively invited me to interview without even looking at my work or replying to my email, and instead asked me where my work was. What’s strange is that the caller even identified himself as being in sales. I have to wonder: Is the HR department at this 90-person company just collecting a salary without doing anything? Or do they not have HR at all? :)
At the end of the call, I also asked why they hadn’t replied at the time. The other person simply said, “I’m replying to you now.”
No kidding—I obviously know you’re replying to me now. But after sending someone an interview invitation, you then go nearly two weeks without any word. That proves your recruiting process is unbelievably terrible: you made the interviewee wait and prepare for nothing, without even giving an explanation. Let’s be clear: you were the ones who actively approached me about an interview. Your company must be the only one that doesn’t even know how to use the 104 reply system anymore, huh? LOL
Did not join the company.
Although I did not join the company, the HR team's lack of care was evident.
Day 1: Received an invitation to submit a résumé.
Day 2: Took the time to carefully submit my résumé.
Day 3: Was notified that my professional background was not suitable for the position.
Then, on Day 4: Received another invitation to submit a résumé.
The HR team's actions left a very poor impression.
The HR staff were very polite
The interview was scheduled for around 10:30.
However, HR told me that the previous interview had not finished yet and asked me to wait.
I ended up waiting until 11:30,
and eventually left without having the interview at all.
Although I was notified in advance,
that was still far too long to wait!
They later called to explain,
saying that the previous candidate had arrived late.
Even so, they should have ended that interview on time,
rather than making someone who arrived on time wait for an hour,
wasting their time.
All the employees are quite young, and everyone gets along well.
There is absolutely no culture of working overtime, and the RD department strongly encourages everyone to learn!
Overall performance is also growing rapidly,
and the product has fairly strong integrated competitiveness!
The owner and managers all come from Taiwan’s tech industry,
and have inherited the kind of hierarchical mindset associated with the poor culture of Taiwanese companies.
They expect employees to work during their off-hours (but do not require it),
and the company lacks professionalism in many areas,
making it impossible to evaluate employees’ work results accurately.
Overall compensation is on the low side, and the HR policies are poor for a startup,
with everything operating right at the limits of the Labor Standards Act.
Encourages employees to learn independently and develop problem-solving skills; the product is distinctive.
None at present