德瑪凱股份有限公司

Just said goodbye to a female wage thief.

She applied using a false name.

She didn’t work for even 5 days, but stole 20 days’ worth of wages.

The company is compassionate.

Punctual working hours

Convenient transportation

Newly renovated office

The boss, HR, and quality assurance staff are gentle and friendly

The senior colleagues are also quite nice

The boss is very willing to spend money sending new employees to training

The supervisor places great importance on employee safety at work

New products are under development, and capable new employees and experienced consultants have joined, which should bring promising prospects

The following criticisms concern a certain junior supervisor only and have nothing to do with anyone else.

This person posts a large number of these articles during working hours—I have no idea what they are doing...

They even used the same article repeatedly to flood the page; it is simply despicable and shameless.

They make up a whole bunch of stories about people whom foreign companies did not want; it is utterly shameless.

The downside is that after being subjected to verbal bullying, you should promptly submit your resignation. Do not wait two or three months—it is truly frightening! They stubbornly claim that it was the employee’s own decision, but in fact, once the other person sensed that something was wrong, they had already submitted their resignation. There are records of the conversations. This person is not the boss and has no authority to decide whether anyone stays or leaves. Moreover, what they said was completely untrue. They even secretly complained to the boss, leaving the person involved completely in the dark and showing no respect for them at all. On the afternoon of the employee’s last day, they acted arrogantly to the point that even the HR staff nearby could not stand it. It was utterly shameless.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Supplement to the previous article:

The following criticisms concern a certain junior supervisor only and have nothing to do with anyone else.

This person is skilled at rubbing salt into other people’s wounds. Now I am using the same approach to sprinkle salt on their wound, hoping they can understand how others feel. The encrypted meaning of the salt grains is as follows:

1. This young junior supervisor achieved success early, thinks highly of themself, is overconfident and complacent, speaks bluntly, and loves to lecture people. Their tone is bureaucratic and affectedly mature! They like to deliberately act as though everything is purely businesslike and handled according to procedure, but in reality they lack empathy, cannot hear other people’s voices, and disregard their feelings and opinions. They are like a cup filled to the brim with water—arrogant and overbearing!!! After every conversation, they always like to tell the other person to go back, calm down, and think it over (rather than saying that we should both calm down first), so the other person only becomes increasingly angry after each conversation!!! Yet they always believe they are 100% in the right. Even when the other person apologizes and takes responsibility, their own attitude and tone remain condescending, forceful, and rigid. This puts employees who are not articulate at a severe disadvantage and creates an extremely unfriendly environment. This person also likes to invoke the company’s position during conversations to pressure others, while failing to hear the core concerns they are trying to communicate.

2. Moreover, after using experimental tools, they never put them away properly, and there is no designated place for them. As a junior supervisor, they do not manage this either, resulting in other colleagues saying that they cannot find things.

3. When an employee voluntarily expressed their intention to resign, they explained that they would handle it themself once prepared. Although the junior supervisor had an obligation to report the situation at the plant to their superior, their approach was to go ahead of the employee’s plan and report to the superior alone, without consulting the employee or going together, seemingly trying to catch the employee off guard. It is difficult to say that there was not at least some retaliatory feeling or intent involved!!! This was extremely immature, dishonorable, and disrespectful. Most importantly, when speaking with an employee who has already submitted a resignation application and begun the process, a supervisor’s manner should become polite and courteous, rather than remaining sharp and domineering as though speaking to a subordinate. It was truly astonishing and something I had never seen before!!! During the conversation, they even ordered the other person not to interrupt. The problem is that what this person said clearly did not reflect what the other person meant or wanted to express, yet they repeatedly and forcefully twisted the other person’s words and霸道地不允許別人更正，讓人有種強權壓迫的感覺！！！憑甚麼別人要靜靜的聽你抹黑！！！尤其員工都離職了，還用那種命令式的口吻，請問你是別人的爹還是娘！！！從沒遇過一個EQ如此堪憂，處理方式欠缺周延思考，不夠細膩，且缺乏管理經驗的命令型強勢主管！那股硬脾氣簡直跟一塊石頭沒甚麼兩樣，完全不懂各退一步的道理，常常要別人虛心，但自己對別人卻帶有傲氣，自己還全然不自知。比如：某前輩提到某光學領域，該小主管便毫不思考地秒回覆，連問都不問，直接說其他人都不懂，很不尊重在場的其他人！你怎知別人沒從事過該項領域！憑什麼你覺得別人都不懂！事實上在場同仁有人曾拿過X光相關專利，卻要遭他這般言語壓抑忽視，真的很不禮貌。

另外再補充一下關於「打斷別人說話」其實還存在另一則小插曲，那就是當員工嘗試敘述係因過往無相關經驗可能導致的現況及原因時，卻遭該小主管毫不留情的打斷，以極主觀的方式判定對方就是在找藉口，導致員工備感無助與壓迫，並感到極度不受尊重。

4. Because the plant has not established a clear set of house rules, new employees are inevitably scolded or given instructions when they are unaware of them. Moreover, these incidents were unintentional and were not repeated afterward. However, this junior supervisor really likes to bring up every matter at once during arguments, as though settling old scores, which strongly suggests a retaliatory attitude and intent! This makes them seem extremely petty and narrow-minded!!!

5. Following on from the above, when someone mentioned that this person was not broad-minded enough (the person speaking to them only said it once or twice), this junior supervisor unexpectedly retaliated during the conversation by repeatedly saying that the other person was not “open-minded”!!!!! (At least five times.) They tried to use repetition to overwhelm the other person, making themself—the junior supervisor—seem even more petty and narrow-minded!!! They also use things you have said to attack you in return, caring only about winning arguments and completely disregarding other people’s feelings. They have never considered the far-reaching impact that such sharp and malicious words might have on others, or that they could even endanger someone’s life. They seriously lack the bearing expected of a male supervisor. Whether they are suitable to serve as a supervisor should be reassessed!

6. When this junior supervisor gets into an argument with someone, they seize on minor mistakes that the person has not repeated (for example, forgetting to take out the trash) and exaggerate them, using extremely malicious words (such as saying that it is something to laugh at) to reinforce and embellish the incident, humiliating the new employee’s self-esteem instead of introducing the company culture and matters requiring attention through guidance when the newcomer first joined. Furthermore, while humiliating the new employee, this supervisor forgot that they had a meeting with the boss at ten o’clock on Monday morning and went to provide training for someone else, causing everyone to wait for more than 40 minutes until the boss became angry. This junior supervisor has worked at the company for nearly three years, yet still made such a mistake. Is that not the bigger joke!!!!!!

This person is skilled at using a machine-gun-like mouth during arguments, firing all their words at others in an instant and leaving them completely unable to defend themselves! Such a lack of empathy and disregard for other people’s mental well-being is deeply concerning.

7. This person appears to silently endure things, but privately tells another person—their friend—everything, so that the friend will vent their anger on their behalf. They do not realize that matters between them and the other person (who had already apologized) should have been discussed one-on-one, rather than recruiting someone to form a two-against-one situation that cleverly puts the person being confronted at a disadvantage. The manner of conversation was also aggressive and intimidating, giving the impression of bullying!

8. They suddenly told others that they should respect the administrative “older sister” (which was hilarious—no one ever said they should not be respected! And until the employee resigned, there was basically no opportunity to interact with her), yet this person was once described by a former graphic designer (I recall that the designer had already resigned) as “a cup filled to the brim with water.” The other person probably also sensed this junior supervisor’s arrogance and rigidity. Judging from this, it seems that the junior supervisor is actually the one who does not respect administrative staff very much!

9. Finally, a good R&D engineer is not necessarily a good technician, especially when they have no background or experience in the relevant field! It is like having an excellent doctor work on a construction site: they may not necessarily do a better job than the workers there!

Conclusion: Communication with others should be honest, kind, and peaceful, not arrogant and overbearing!!! In group meetings, people should respect others’ expertise and remain humble, rather than instantly claiming that everyone else knows nothing!!! This kind of arrogance, complacency, and self-righteous attitude is truly unacceptable. In addition, as a junior supervisor, one should learn to respect and consider other people’s feelings, and listen a little to their voices and concerns, rather than constantly attacking them and deliberately twisting their words, which makes people feel oppressed by authority!!! This is extremely rude and disrespectful; in communication, one should be willing to let things go rather than making it so that no one at the entire plant can ever win an argument with them.

That is all.

I previously worked at this company but left when the department I served was merged into a foreign-owned company. The company encourages employees to pursue further education and covers course fees. It is a fairly good opportunity for professional development.

Half of the employees are long-term staff, so the company is relatively stable.

Employees who just coast along will be laid off, but fortunately, everyone gets along well with their colleagues. Employees have received profit-sharing bonuses for two consecutive years, which is a modest perk.

The product lines have recently expanded, and the company is hiring aggressively.

Best wishes to my former employer.

The downside is that if you do not want to put in much effort, you can coast for three months and then wait to be laid off. No vegetarian options are provided for lunch.

I used to work at this company, but I left because the department I worked for was merged into a foreign-owned company. The company encourages employees to pursue further education and covers the cost of classes. It is a fairly good opportunity for professional development.

Half of the employees are long-term staff, so the company is relatively stable.

Employees who are just coasting are laid off, and fortunately, everyone gets along well with their colleagues. Employees have received profit sharing for two consecutive years, which is a small perk.

Recently, the product lines have increased, and the company has been hiring aggressively.

Best wishes to my former employer.

The downside is that if you do not want to put in much effort, you can coast for three months and then wait to be laid off. No vegetarian lunch options are provided.

I used to work at this company, but left after the department I served was merged into a foreign-owned company. The company encourages employees to pursue further education and pays for course fees. It is considered a fairly good opportunity for professional development.

Long-term employees make up half of the workforce, so it is relatively stable.

Employees who just coast along are laid off, but fortunately, colleagues generally get along well. Employees have received profit sharing for two consecutive years, which is a modest benefit.

The product lines have recently expanded, and the company is hiring aggressively.

Best wishes to my former employer.

The downside is that if you are not interested in putting in extra effort, you can coast for three months and then wait to be laid off. No vegetarian lunch is provided.

I used to work at this company, but left when the department I worked for was merged into a foreign company. The company encourages employees to pursue further education and pays the tuition. It’s a fairly good opportunity for professional development.

Half of the employees are long-timers, so it’s relatively stable.

Employees who just coast along will be laid off, but fortunately, everyone gets along well with their colleagues. There has been an employee profit-sharing bonus for two consecutive years, which is a small perk.

The product lines have increased recently, and the company is recruiting aggressively.

Best wishes to my former employer.

The downside is that if you don’t want to put in much effort, you can coast for three months and then wait to be laid off. No vegetarian lunch options are provided.

I used to work at this company, but I left because the department I worked for was merged into a foreign-owned company. The company encourages employees to pursue further education and pays for course fees. It is considered a pretty good opportunity for professional development.

Half of the employees are long-term staff, so the company is fairly stable.

Employees who just coast along are laid off, but fortunately, everyone gets along well with their colleagues. There have been employee profit-sharing bonuses for two consecutive years, which is a nice little perk.

The product lines have increased recently, and the company is recruiting aggressively.

Best wishes to my former employer.

The downside is that if you do not want to put in much effort, you can coast for three months and then wait to be laid off. No vegetarian options are provided for lunch.

I used to work at this company, but I left because the department I worked for was merged into a foreign-owned company. The company encourages employees to pursue further education and covers the cost of classes. It is a fairly good opportunity for professional development.

Half of the employees are long-term staff, so the company is relatively stable.

Employees who just coast along are laid off, but fortunately, everyone gets along well with their colleagues. Employees have received profit sharing for two consecutive years, which is a modest benefit.

Recently, the company has expanded its product lines and is hiring aggressively.

Best wishes to my former employer.

The downside is that if you do not want to put in much effort, you can coast for three months and then wait to be laid off. No vegetarian meals are provided for lunch.

I previously worked at this company, but left when the department I served was merged into a foreign-owned company. This company encourages employees to pursue further education, and the company pays the course fees. It is a fairly good opportunity for professional development.

Long-term employees make up half of the workforce, so it is relatively stable.

Employees who just coast along are laid off, but fortunately, the colleagues get along well. Employees have received profit sharing for two consecutive years, which is a modest benefit.

The product lines have increased recently, and the company is hiring aggressively.

Best wishes to my former employer.

The downside is that if you do not want to put in much effort, you can coast for three months and then wait to be laid off. No vegetarian lunch options are provided.

I used to work at this company, but left because the department I served was merged into a foreign company. The company encourages employees to pursue further education, and pays for course fees. It’s a pretty good opportunity for professional development.

Half of the employees are long-term staff, so it’s fairly stable.

Employees who just coast along are laid off, but fortunately everyone gets along well with their colleagues. There has been an employee profit-sharing bonus for two consecutive years, which is a nice little benefit.

The product lines have increased recently, and the company is recruiting aggressively.

Best wishes to my former employer.

The downside is that if you don’t want to put in much effort, you can coast for three months and then wait to be laid off. There is no vegetarian option for lunch.

I used to work at this company, but I left because the department I worked in was merged into a foreign-owned company. This company encourages employees to pursue further education and pays the course fees. It is quite a good opportunity for professional development.

Half of the employees are long-term staff, so the company is fairly stable.

Employees who just coast along are laid off, but fortunately, the colleagues get along well. Employees have received profit-sharing bonuses for two consecutive years, which is a nice little benefit.

The product lines have increased recently, and the company is recruiting aggressively.

Best wishes to my former employer.

The downside is that if you do not want to put in much effort, you can coast for three months and then wait to be laid off. No vegetarian meals are provided for lunch.

I used to work at this company but left because the department I worked for was merged into a foreign-owned company. The company encourages employees to pursue further education and covers the tuition costs. It's a fairly good opportunity for professional development.

Half of the employees are long-term staff, so the company is relatively stable.

Employees who just coast along are laid off, but fortunately, colleagues generally get along well. Employees have received profit-sharing bonuses for two consecutive years, which is a modest perk.

The product lines have recently expanded, and the company is recruiting aggressively.

Best wishes to my former employer.

The downside is that if you don't want to put in extra effort, you can coast for three months and then wait to be laid off.

I used to work at this company, but I left because the department I served in was merged into a foreign company. The company encourages employees to pursue further education and pays the course fees. It is considered a fairly good opportunity for professional development.

Long-term employees make up half of the workforce, so the company is relatively stable.

Employees who are just coasting are laid off, but fortunately, everyone gets along well with their colleagues. There has been an employee profit-sharing bonus for two consecutive years, which is a nice little benefit.

Recently, the company has expanded its product lines and has been recruiting aggressively.

Best wishes to my former employer.

The downside is that if you do not want to work hard, you can coast for three months and then wait to be laid off.

I used to work at this company, but left because the department I served was merged into a foreign-owned company. This company encourages employees to pursue further education, and the company pays for course fees. It is considered a fairly good opportunity for professional development.

Long-term employees make up half of the workforce, so it is relatively stable.

Employees who just coast along will be laid off, but fortunately, colleagues generally get along well. Employees have received profit sharing for two consecutive years, which is a modest perk.

The product lines have increased recently, and the company is hiring aggressively.

Best wishes to my former employer.

The downside is that if you do not want to work very hard, you can coast for three months and then wait to be laid off.

I used to work at this company, but left when the department I worked for was merged into a foreign-owned company. The company encourages employees to pursue further education and covers the cost of classes. It is considered a fairly good opportunity for professional development.

Half of the employees are long-term staff, so the company is relatively stable.

Employees who just coast along will be laid off, but fortunately, everyone gets along well with their colleagues. There have been employee profit-sharing bonuses for two consecutive years, which is a small perk.

The product lines have increased recently, and the company is recruiting aggressively.

Best wishes to my former employer

The downside is that if you are not interested in putting in extra effort, you can coast for three months and then wait to be laid off.

I used to work at this company, but I left because the department I served was merged into a foreign company. The company encourages employees to pursue further education and pays the course fees. It is a fairly good opportunity for professional development.

Half of the employees are long-term staff, so the company is relatively stable.

Employees who just coast along are laid off, but fortunately, everyone gets along well with their colleagues. Employees have received profit-sharing bonuses for two consecutive years, which is a modest perk.

Recently, the product lines have increased, and the company has been hiring aggressively.

Best wishes to my former employer.

The downside is that if you do not want to put in much effort, you can coast for three months and then wait to be laid off.

Punctual working hours

Convenient transportation

Newly renovated office

The boss, HR, and quality assurance staff are gentle and friendly

The senior colleagues are also quite nice

The boss is very willing to spend money to send new employees to training

The supervisor places great importance on employee safety at work

New products are under development, and capable new employees and experienced consultants have joined, which should bring promising prospects

The following criticisms concern a certain junior supervisor and have nothing to do with anyone else.

This person is skilled at rubbing salt into other people's wounds. Now I am doing the same to him, hoping he can experience how others feel; the coded messages in the salt crystals are deciphered below:

1. This young junior supervisor rose to prominence early, thinks highly of himself, is overconfident and complacent, speaks harshly, and loves to lecture people. His tone is bureaucratic and affectedly mature! He likes to deliberately act as though everything is handled strictly according to procedure, but in reality he lacks empathy, cannot hear other people's voices, and disregards their feelings and ideas. He is like a glass filled to the brim with water, condescending and arrogant!!! After every conversation, he always likes to tell others to go back, calm down, and think it over (rather than saying that we should all calm down first), so the other party only gets angrier after each conversation!!! Yet he always thinks he is 100% in the right; even when others apologize and take responsibility, his attitude and tone remain high-handed, forceful, and harsh. This puts employees who are not articulate at an extremely unfriendly disadvantage. During conversations, this person also likes to use the fact that he is speaking from the company's position to pressure others, while failing to hear the core concerns they are trying to communicate.

2. He also never puts away the experimental tools after using them, and there is no designated place for them. As a junior supervisor, he has not managed this properly, resulting in other colleagues saying that they cannot find things.

3. When an employee voluntarily expressed an intention to resign, the employee had already explained that they would handle it themselves after making the necessary preparations. Although this junior supervisor had a duty to report the situation at the site to his superiors, he instead went ahead of the employee's plans and reported to the superior alone, without consulting the employee or going together, seemingly trying to catch the employee unprepared. It is difficult to say that there was not even a hint of a retaliatory feeling or implication!!! This was very immature, underhanded, and disrespectful of others. Most importantly, when speaking with an employee who has submitted a resignation application (and has already begun the process), a supervisor should become courteous and polite, rather than continuing to act like a sharp and domineering superior addressing a subordinate. It was truly astonishing and something I had never seen before!!! During the conversation, he even ordered the other person not to interrupt him. The problem is that what he said clearly did not reflect what the other person meant or wanted to express, yet he repeatedly and forcefully twisted the other person's words and domineeringly refused to let them correct him, creating a sense of authoritarian oppression!!! Why should anyone have to sit quietly and listen to you smear them!!! The employee had already resigned, yet he still used that commanding tone—are you their father or mother!!! I have never encountered a command-oriented, domineering supervisor with such worrying emotional intelligence, such poorly considered handling, such a lack of subtlety, and so little management experience! His stubborn temper is practically indistinguishable from a rock; he completely fails to understand the principle of each side taking one step back. He often tells others to be humble, yet treats others arrogantly, without being aware of it himself. For example, when a senior colleague mentioned an optical field, this junior supervisor immediately replied without thinking or even asking questions, directly saying that the others did not understand. This was extremely disrespectful to everyone else present! How do you know that others have never worked in that field? What makes you think that everyone else does not understand! In fact, someone present had previously obtained a patent related to X-rays, yet had to endure being verbally suppressed and ignored by him. It was truly impolite.

To add another detail concerning “interrupting others,” there was also a separate incident. When an employee tried to explain that the current situation and its causes might have resulted from having no relevant prior experience, this junior supervisor showed no mercy and interrupted, subjectively deciding that the person was simply making excuses. This left the employee feeling helpless, oppressed, and extremely disrespected.

4. Since the site has not established a clear set of house rules, it is inevitable that new employees may be scolded or instructed without knowing the rules. Moreover, the incident was unintentional and was not repeated afterward. Nevertheless, this junior supervisor particularly enjoys bringing up and settling every past matter at once during arguments, as though keeping a score of old grievances, with a strong sense and implication of retaliation! This makes him appear extremely petty and narrow-minded!!!

5. Continuing from the above, when someone mentioned that he was not broad-minded enough (the person being addressed only said it once or twice), this junior supervisor actually refused to back down and gradually said during the conversation that the other person was not “open-minded”!!!!! (At least five times.) He tried to overwhelm the other person by sheer repetition, making himself—the junior supervisor—appear even more petty and narrow-minded!!! He also turns your own words around to attack you, only seeking to win an argument and completely disregarding other people's feelings. He has never considered the far-reaching impact that such caustic words could have on others, or that they could even endanger someone's life. He seriously lacks the demeanor expected of a “male” supervisor. Whether he is suitable to serve as a supervisor should be reassessed!

6. When this junior supervisor gets into an argument with someone, he grabs onto minor past mistakes that were not repeated (for example, forgetting to take out the trash) and exaggerates and sensationalizes them. He uses extremely malicious language (such as “watching a joke”) to reinforce and dramatize the incident, humiliating the new employee's self-esteem, instead of introducing the company culture and points to note in detail through guidance when the newcomer first joined. Furthermore, while humiliating the newcomer, this supervisor himself forgot that he had a meeting with the boss at ten o'clock on Monday morning and went off to provide training for someone else, making everyone wait for more than 40 minutes until the boss became angry. This junior supervisor has worked at the company for nearly three years, yet still made such a mistake. Is that not an even bigger joke!!!!!!!

This person is skilled at using a machine-gun-like mouth during arguments, firing all his words at others in an instant and leaving them unable to respond! Such a lack of empathy and disregard for other people's mental well-being are truly worrying signs of poor character.

7. This person appears to silently endure things, but privately tells another person (his friend) everything, allowing that person to stand up for him. He fails to understand that matters between himself and the other person (who had already apologized) should be discussed one-on-one, rather than bringing in reinforcements and using a two-against-one approach to cleverly put the person being addressed at a disadvantage. Moreover, his manner of speaking during the exchange was aggressive and intimidating, raising serious suspicions of bullying!

8. He suddenly told others that they should respect the administrative “older sister” (which was hilarious—no one ever said she should not be respected! Besides, there was fundamentally no opportunity to interact with her before leaving the company), yet a former graphic designer who had already left (if I remember correctly, it was a former graphic designer) once described him as “a glass filled to the brim with water.” That person probably also sensed this junior supervisor's arrogance and harshness. In that case, it seems that the junior supervisor is actually the one who does not respect administrative staff very much!

9. Finally, a good R&D engineer is not necessarily a good technician, especially if they have no background or relevant experience in the field! It is like having an excellent doctor do construction work on a building site: they may not necessarily do it better than the workers there!

Conclusion: Communication with others should be sincere, considerate, and calm, rather than arrogant and overbearing!!! In group meetings, respect other people's expertise and remain humble instead of instantly declaring that everyone else does not understand!!! This kind of pride, complacency, and self-righteous attitude is truly unacceptable. In addition, as a junior supervisor, one should learn to respect and consider other people's feelings, and listen a little to their voices and concerns, rather than constantly attacking them and deliberately twisting their words, creating a sense of authoritarian oppression!!! Treating others this way is extremely impolite and disrespectful. In communication, one should be willing to let matters go rather than ensuring that no one at the entire site can ever win an argument against them.

That is all.

I've been here for almost a year, and the environment is really good. There is a small gathering every month, and the colleagues get along harmoniously. Unlike what the people in the previous posts said, it's impossible to get by here if you're a loser; it's quite normal for losers to lack ability.

There are more and more product lines, and it takes time to keep up.

Performance bonuses are higher than the industry average

If you just want to coast, definitely don't come here. Last time, a sales specialist was caught making up entries in their daily report. They claimed to have visited a clinic even though it wasn't open that day, which amounted to A-ing the company's fuel and parking expenses, and they nearly got sued.

Senior employees received employee bonuses this year.

Usually, it’s those who want to coast or freeload who say it’s “terrible.” If you have no performance, are they supposed to support you for 10 or 20 years? Of course, a small temple cannot accommodate a big monk. The senior employees commenting here should currently be thriving and earning annual salaries of over ten million, right…

Think about it: the company doesn’t owe you a single cent in salary. Do you really have the nerve to say it’s terrible?

It’s getting harder and harder to coast.

Can't think of any.

There is no system, and the rules keep changing

Departments often pass the buck to one another

The female supervisor has serious problems

Customer complaints and equipment failures are endless

The sales team is caught in the middle

A company that frequently lays people off

Can't think of any.

There is no system, and the rules are constantly changing.

People often pass the buck internally.

The female supervisor has serious problems.

Customer complaints and breakdown issues are endless.

Sales staff are caught in the middle.

A company that very often lays people off.

No advantages whatsoever

They really love laying off employees, and will even deliberately give a reason for the dismissal that makes you feel it is perfectly reasonable.

They always take advantage of the first three months of the probationary period.

They dismiss employees when they are working their hardest.

They do not consider employees important assets.

Many employees have suffered greatly.

I worked very well with my colleagues at the time, and with their assistance, I obtained the required certification very smoothly.

There is a lack of respect for professional expertise. Female managers would request changes to documents or products based on their personal preferences, making it impossible for the relevant departments to operate. Many people failed to do their own work properly yet interfered with other departments, preventing them from working according to regulations. In addition, previous employees left behind a pile of unresolved problems. The system drove out the good employees: those who were capable either resigned or were forced out, while only those with good relationships with senior management or who appeared to generate revenue for the company were retained. Hiring decisions were not based on character, and many favored employees had questionable character.

The work is easy, and there is no overtime.

Before I started working, I found out that this company had violated the Sexual Assault Prevention Act and was fined NT$100,000.

I thought it should be fine—the person who broke the law had probably already left the company.

But after I started working, I discovered... that person was still there... and is someone who will not resign...

The boss is okay.

The boss’s wife is extremely bossy, and there are no established procedures.

The female colleagues’ cliques are very pronounced, and they exclude newcomers.

New employees are given a hard time whenever they ask questions. Not recommended!