Manager Chen is truly outstanding—so outstanding that I had to come to this platform to praise him. I’ve never seen a supervisor go so far as to pin a fabricated accusation on a young woman and verbally abuse her so loudly that people outside could hear. Is it really acceptable for an older person to bully a young woman like this? Once might be forgivable, but I’ve heard it happen more than once. What kind of deep hatred would make someone need to yell at another person so loudly? This has reached the level of serious workplace bullying. Why can’t the company’s senior management simply stand by and do nothing, allowing a supervisor like this to bully others? Could it be that this manager has some undisclosed connection that allows him to remain comfortably at the company without being fired? Or is this simply the company’s internal policy—that everyone who joins the company must be humiliated once before they can stay here for more than a decade?
Manager Chen is truly outstanding—so outstanding that I had to come to this platform to praise him. I’ve never seen a supervisor go so far as to pin a fabricated accusation on a young woman and verbally abuse her so loudly that people outside could hear. Is it really acceptable for an older person to bully a young woman like this? Once might be forgivable, but I’ve heard it happen more than once. What kind of deep hatred would make someone need to yell at another person so loudly? This has reached the level of serious workplace bullying. Why can’t the company’s senior management simply stand by and do nothing, allowing a supervisor like this to bully others? Could it be that this manager has some undisclosed connection that allows him to remain comfortably at the company without being fired? Or is this simply the company’s internal policy—that everyone who joins the company must be humiliated once before they can stay here for more than a decade?
Recruiting someone to accompany elementary school girls for 5 days! Xiaojishanggong’s comment saying “Let me say first: this is not allowed” was harshly criticized
Recently, a netizen posted a screenshot on Threads. It showed a man from Changhua County posting a side-job task on “Xiaojishanggong,” offering NT$8,500 for one assignment in hopes of recruiting someone to accompany three elementary school girls in Changhua City for five days. Unexpectedly, the post drew a comment from the Xiaojishanggong editor: “Everyone, calm down! Let me say first: this is not allowed!” In response, podcaster Lomos directly screenshotted the editor’s reply and posted a scathing criticism: “What exactly are you saying is not allowed? Is this something an adult should be doing? Isn’t this disgusting?”
20260806 Xiaojishanggong was criticized for a comment involving the sexual exploitation of minors. Photo／Reproduced from Threads／chickpts
Xiaojishanggong was criticized for a comment involving the sexual exploitation of minors. Photo／Reproduced from Threads／chickpts
The few short words immediately led people to associate the comment with implications of sexual exploitation of minors, prompting large numbers of netizens to angrily criticize the editor’s thoughtless statement: “What the heck? Something like this can be posted? The editor even replied as if it were a joke—what terrible crisis PR,” “I thought it was some disgusting creep, but it turned out to be the editor too. This is outrageous,” “Aside from the comment, the most important thing is to strictly review and screen the posting of problematic tasks like this,” “Wasn’t the original meaning of the job opening to act as a babysitter? The male netizen and the editor are the ones thinking perversely. They’re both disgusting!”
After realizing that the comment had sparked outrage, the Xiaojishanggong editor quietly deleted the controversial comment and explained that its intended meaning was to remind the public that “any inappropriate thoughts involving minors are not allowed,” rather than “making jokes about minors.” The editor said the controversial comment had caused misunderstanding because it was not expressed fully, and that more attention would be paid to the way comments are written in the future.
20260806 The Xiaojishanggong editor only apologized in the comments and did not issue a separate apology statement explaining the incident. Photo／Reproduced from Threads／chickpts
The Xiaojishanggong editor only apologized in the comments and did not issue a separate apology statement explaining the incident. Photo／Reproduced from Threads／chickpts
However, netizens did not accept this apology. The editor later issued a second apology, saying that they were now deeply reflecting and emphasizing that no issue involving minors could tolerate the slightest carelessness, and that a brand should have a higher level of moral sensitivity and social responsibility: “This mistake is a responsibility we cannot shirk, and it is also something we must face seriously and review deeply.” The editor said the brand had immediately conducted a comprehensive review of its social-media response procedures, strengthened training on sensitive issues, and established stricter review mechanisms to prevent similar incidents from happening again.
Large numbers of netizens were dissatisfied that Xiaojishanggong apologized only in the comments instead of issuing a separate formal apology statement. They also questioned the platform’s standards for reviewing the content of jobs posted by users: “You’re not going to issue a formal apology post? Do you take the people who use your platform for idiots?” “You should use your official account to issue a formal apology instead of sneakily apologizing in the comments,” “So my interpretation is that any filthy criminal job can be posted on Xiaojishanggong, right? Do you even review the posted job content?” “How could this kind of job content be successfully published on your platform? I want to know what your review standards are.”
★ Jing Bao cares about you: ◎ Respect bodily autonomy. Please call 113 or 110.
As of 8/16, there was still no information indicating that this company had fired the disgusting men and women.
You can tell what kind of people this company hires.
1. Force employees not to wear masks, so we can all happily spread viruses together; we even have an air purifier—amazing.
2. Make it difficult for employees to take leave: first say it is allowed, then change your mind and say it is not, forcibly turning it into an absence without leave.
3. Put effort into writing a reading reflection, but the supervisor cannot understand it. Just use AI—after reading so many books, you still have not managed to integrate what you learned.
4. Employees’ years of service are directly proportional to the amount of clutter they accumulate. I have even seen cockroaches and ants crawl out of it.
5. Every year, employees must be forced to dress up carefully and act like monkeys once to please senior management.
6. There are many feudal lords, so you can enjoy the feeling of being a servant.
7. KPI? OKR? If your emperor approves, it is good; if not, you are guilty.
7. Present yourself: you can learn many things. If the emperor says to do it and you do not, you will be thrown into the imperial prison.
8. The emperor does not want to learn anything new, yet demands that employees innovate and keep up with the times, while their own behavior remains stuck in the Industrial Revolution.
1. There is no designated area for supervisors to insult people, so supervisors humiliate colleagues at their desks.
2. Certain laws are being violated. Unfortunately, I did not file a report when I resigned.
3. At other companies, people line up for snacks because there are many varieties; here, it is because the process is terrible.
4. Salaries have no tax-free allowance.
5. All employees keep an eye on one another, but only the monkeys are subjected to rumors and slander.
I heard that the supervisor who bullies people is about to close on a house, so everyone please be a little more understanding.
6. You can experience Squid Game Pro firsthand, but the setting and NPCs are not very well developed.
Why hasn't the supervisor who bullies others been fired yet?
Excellent
They were very friendly to everyone during the interview and said that this was the highest salary for the position. Only after joining did I find out that I was actually the lowest-paid employee.
After joining the new company, when the new company called back to ask about my evaluation, they would always say that it was the employee’s fault. It’s best not to come here and leave a bad record. A narrow-minded company like this should let the market decide whether it stays or goes. Unless you want people to say all sorts of things about you, my advice is to avoid joining altogether.
Workplace bullying at this company is extremely serious—they have done everything you can imagine.
The supervisor who bullies people is still holding a high position here to this day.
No wonder the reviews keep getting deleted; no matter how many are deleted, they never seem to run out.
Slandering others is what this place does best.
Everything you didn’t do gets pinned on you.
All the good things you did are completely ignored.
May I ask whether this company dares to stop bullying good employees?
Do you have to wait until something serious happens before apologizing?
Workplace bullying at this company is extremely serious—they have done everything you can imagine.
The supervisor who bullies people is still holding a high position here to this day.
No wonder the reviews keep getting deleted; no matter how many are deleted, they never seem to run out.
Slandering others is what this place does best.
Everything you didn’t do gets pinned on you.
All the good things you did are completely ignored.
May I ask whether this company dares to stop bullying good employees?
Do you have to wait until something serious happens before apologizing?
A group of “senior employees” who have stayed until their legs go numb are running the company.
Their thinking is stuck in the last century, yet they still claim to be at the forefront of the industry.
Compared with the real tech industry, the benefits here can only be considered average,
but internally, they live in a parallel universe where “our benefits are amazing.”
The only real advantage is probably this—being able to leave here after work.
Promotion system: The manager eats something sweet today = you get promoted; the manager drinks bitter tea today = you get fired.
Emotional management: It feels like playing an “emotional escape game” all day.
Institutional philosophy: Ask the manager, “What are the company’s policies?” and the answer is: “I am the policy.” So corporate culture = personal taste.
Reason for leaving: “You’re not a good fit here.”
Time logic: One minute late → take one hour of leave.
Professional theater: Non-experts instruct professionals, know nothing about the work, and have no desire to learn, yet use “I’m the manager” as a universal get-out-of-jail-free card.
Performance reviews: No need to look at ability—just nodding along can earn you an A+; speaking the truth gets you an automatic F. Performance is measured by KPI (Kiss People’s Insides).
Bonus features:
There’s a time clock to punch in and out. When I told a friend, they thought I worked in a factory making parts.
The company calls itself a “tech company” externally, but internally it’s still living in the 1980s manufacturing industry.
OKR/KPI = the boss checking a box, employees surrendering their souls, and everyone paying an IQ tax.
Employee education and training? Doesn’t exist. The only training is “learning to keep your mouth shut.”
Every month we have to write a book report. Anyone who didn’t know better would think I was attending cram school and turning in essays.
After joining the company, I discovered that it was really frightening.
If an employee is genuinely suspected of violating the law, the company should file a lawsuit directly and let such a malicious person hit a wall and learn a lesson.
Doesn’t not filing a lawsuit mean there is no evidence at all to bring a case? Why keep smearing others?
After joining the company, I discovered that it was really frightening.
If an employee is genuinely suspected of violating the law, the company should file a lawsuit directly and let such a malicious person hit a wall and learn a lesson.
Doesn’t not filing a lawsuit mean there is no evidence at all to bring a case? Why keep smearing others?
1. Technical skills are not advanced; a technology can be used for a long time, and new proposals will not be approved, but if they are proposed by a manager, they have a chance of being approved.
2. Workplace villains can stay for a long time, and may even remain until retirement.
3. Maliciously dismissing people allows them to quickly change their work environment.
4. You shoulder the shit, while they take the credit in the performance review; if there is a problem, deal with the person first.
The only relatively good managers may be those in the R&D department. The other managers do not care about the well-being of the employees under them.
Everything. I suggest this Chinese company close down and stop coming out to steal Taiwanese people's information.
People who use this company's products and those considering applying for a job should be careful: your personal information may be stolen and sent to China without your knowledge.
The way decisions are made internally is to first look at how the team in China operates, and then issue instructions to the Taiwan side.
The internal culture is also very Chinese, and the turnover rate continues to rise.
They only make everything look fine on the surface, but internally it is already thoroughly rotten.
Don't be fooled by the promotional messaging on the surface.
Talking🤑about🤑🤑🤑books🥥🥥🥥
Chill👍know👍👍👍ledge chats🥥🥥🥥
Reports☣️☣️☣️☣️☣️☣️☣️tempor✅arily✅suspended Transportation accident scam✅case triggered a rhino🏹🏹🏹collision✅ After repairs, air purification🏹🏹🏹cleanliness inspections✅passed Xbox boxing tournament caused✅a goldfish in the hotel swimming pool that couldn't be pulled out✅to listen to music and play the piano
How is the sparkling water sold at convenience stores made? Do they just put water into bottles? Take you directly into the factory to see the production process of mineral water!｜Tweet tweet tweet tweet tweet tweet tweet tweet tweet tweet tweet tweet
When buying sparkling water outside, I wonder if everyone has ever been curious about this while at the bank: It's all water, so why does some bottled water cost only ten dollars per bottle, while imported premium water can be sold very cheaply—fifty, sixty, seventy, or eighty dollars—to save in ETFs? How is this stock different from the water we drink at home?
For many people with psychological disorders who play soccer, hearing this immediately makes them say, “Are you wearing a mask?” People have said that acid–base body types are all a scam, but because there are trace elements in the water, the final DJ of this naked-body mineral stone water is greater than 7 and
Joining Singapore at an altitude of 3,092 meters, with acidic weather and silicon dioxide, the taste is lighter and smoother, while the eternally rich works’ ingredients—whether they are BTS discs—how are they tested and made into our rhythm? It tastes like rags.
We had a third-party legal certification unit conduct the inspection. The result was very good: there were absolutely no microorganisms or any undesirable substances cut out of a 12T rotten hard drive. Sterilized water wings are used at a rate of 3 to 6 metric tons per hour for 304 or 316 stainless-steel washing pipelines.
If you🦷like🦷it🦷🦷automatically🦷add🦷a🦷subscription🦷 If🦷you🦷don't🦷like🦷it🦷just🦷don't🦷cancel🦷it🦷 Paper🧠strategy🧠is🧠really🧠hard🧠to🧠make🧠money🧠🧠 All🧠touch🧠and🧠reach🧠rates, hurry👞up👞and👞secretly👞buy👞traffic👞from🦷low🦷targets🦷to🦷high🦷points🦷100000🦷views for only 10000🦷yuan, come🍦and🍦join🍦the🍦shoe🍦teaching🍦business🍦cooperation🍦event, now⛽quote⛽a⛽total⛽of⛽40%⛽off⛽or⛽more, the business🍺team🍺is🍺too🍺bad🍺and🍺only🍺does🍺viral🍺marketing🍺so🍺report🍺them.
Very poor. A supervisor said: “Even if there is a performance evaluation, if I think you’re not good, I’ll still give you a low score.”
Performance evaluations are basically tools of office politics!!!
Those who want to get things done and develop new technologies should think twice.
Your photo and résumé may even be kept and mocked.
People with long tenure can make mistakes and still not be fired.
People who haven’t made mistakes may be forced to leave simply because their supervisor doesn’t like them.
What Classmate Chen said was referring to you!!!
The person who spreads gossip and sows discord still hasn’t left the company.
Everyone considering joining should think very carefully—then think again.
Someone inside the company is extremely emotionally out of control.
They blame their own emotions on other people,
saying: “It’s all because of you that I’m emotionally drained.”
It’s 2025 already. Could you please manage your own emotions?
They are very good at maintaining appearances,
which makes new employees think this is a happy company.
Only after actually joining do you discover how chaotic and dysfunctional things are internally.
There is practically no basic system or policy at all.
A company run by personal discretion should not be described so favorably.
It is simply deceiving people into joining.
When checking whether there have been violations of labor laws, you’ll find that there are indeed records of violations.
Very poor. A supervisor said: “Even if there is a performance evaluation, if I think you’re not good, I’ll still give you a low score.”
Performance evaluations are basically tools of office politics!!!
Those who want to get things done and develop new technologies should think twice.
Your photo and résumé may even be kept and mocked.
People with long tenure can make mistakes and still not be fired.
People who haven’t made mistakes may be forced to leave simply because their supervisor doesn’t like them.
What Classmate Chen said was referring to you!!!
The person who spreads gossip and sows discord still hasn’t left the company.
Everyone considering joining should think very carefully—then think again.
Someone inside the company is extremely emotionally out of control.
They blame their own emotions on other people,
saying: “It’s all because of you that I’m emotionally drained.”
It’s 2025 already. Could you please manage your own emotions?
They are very good at maintaining appearances,
which makes new employees think this is a happy company.
Only after actually joining do you discover how chaotic and dysfunctional things are internally.
There is practically no basic system or policy at all.
A company run by personal discretion should not be described so favorably.
It is simply deceiving people into joining.
When checking whether there have been violations of labor laws, you’ll find that there are indeed records of violations.
The benefits are very good if you stay for a long time; they’ll make your legs go numb.
Benefits can be taken away whenever they say so, and salaries can remain unchanged whenever they say so.
None of the promised protections are written into the contract; instead, the contract contains many unfair provisions.
Work rules? They won’t show them to you. They’ll only bring them up after you violate them.
Increased workload? Regardless of whether it falls within the duties agreed upon at the outset, if they tell you to do it, you have to do it. If you don’t, you can get lost.
Overtime pay? Management doesn’t like you reporting overtime, but they will use your working hours to judge how hard you work.
Employee career development? Sorry, it’s common for projects to be shelved immediately after completion, for employees to be assigned miscellaneous tasks on top of their regular work, and even for employees to be laid off or disliked simply because there is no work assigned to them.
In addition to the situations mentioned above, you may also encounter the following:
1. Unwillingness to learn new things: Whenever something is even slightly complicated or difficult—for example, an English-language interface or long-term development planning—they are extremely resistant and may even resent the person who brought it up.
2. Poor emotional control: They throw tantrums and abuse their authority. If you do not agree with the manager’s intentions, they say you are wrong and spread rumors about you everywhere.
3. Unable to communicate: They say they want to communicate with you, but in reality they want you to listen to them. If you cannot reach an agreement, it is your fault.
4. Lack of professionalism: Someone who is not a professional in the relevant field can still be promoted to manager. This is truly astonishing. Can an outsider leading insiders really lead a team well?
The highest year-end bonus for 2025 was only NT$80,000. Performance bonuses are also getting smaller and smaller, and you may even receive zero months’ worth.
I suggest looking at other companies before making a decision.
I also suggest that the company choose the right people as managers and select the right policy direction,
so that it does not gradually begin to decline.
1. The benefits have consistently improved; for example, the 7.5-hour workday and number of annual leave days are both better than what is required by the Labor Standards Act.
2. The lunch is plentiful, and the snack machine is pretty good.
3. The health checkup package is quite good.
4. The desks are large, so there is plenty of room for small items.
5. Some sports clubs receive partial subsidies.
1. Remote work is not allowed. For an internet company to still manage employees in such a traditional way is quite ironic.
2. Every month, you have to read a book issued by the company and write a reflection on it—and it is mandatory. Don't have time during work? Then use your own time! The quality of the books is also inconsistent, and their overall value is rather low.
3. Whether you have a good experience at the company depends greatly on which product you are assigned to. Before the interview, make sure you find out which product you are applying for.
4. There are no flexible working hours. It's already 2024.
5. The technology is relatively outdated, and the company does not seem to be making much effort to improve or look for areas to optimize. If you want to introduce new tools, there is a good chance you will be blocked.
Overall, the benefits are good and improve with seniority. However, because upper management has generally been promoted based on seniority, their views are very conservative and outdated. Working here means either staying for a year or two to add the experience to your résumé and then leaving, or never leaving at all.
The salary and benefits are fairly good, the work environment is relaxed, and overtime is uncommon. You can leave on time without being given dirty looks. The actual working hours are 7.5 hours per day.
Every month, you receive a fixed number of points that can be exchanged for snacks and drinks at the vending machine.
The office has an open-plan layout, so it is easy to be disturbed, especially during lunch breaks.
I’ve heard that the company has comprehensive remote-work arrangements, but for some reason, it does not offer them as a benefit.
The salary is standard, and the benefits are good.
There is a snack cabinet, fruit provided occasionally, and birthday parties.
There are regular technical seminars, and the R&D atmosphere is not bad.
The product management direction is not very clear, and there are quite a few situations where people are busy for nothing.
Overtime is basically treated as an assumed responsibility system; when urgent requests come in, you just have to grit your teeth and do it yourself.
The machines are always under tremendous pressure.
Upper management has outdated thinking, giving the impression that they only care about profitability.
Reasonable salary, good benefits, fruit gift boxes, and occasional afternoon tea
Spacious office, facial-recognition clock-in
No culture of working overtime (as far as the marketing department is concerned)
The conservative culture of a traditional industry company; no eating breakfast after 8:37
(Although I still see veteran employees eating teppanyaki noodles…
There are people who don’t work properly, pay attention to your behavior, and then report you~
Everyone is required to use company computers; bringing your own computer will raise information-security concerns
1. Occasional perks and little unexpected benefits.
2. Colleagues and supervisors are easy to get along with. There is a positive learning environment, with a focus on the business and no scheming or infighting.
3. It is convenient to find food in the park at lunchtime.
1. The staffing structure at each digital station is similar, with few assistant positions. You have to handle everything, big or small, on your own.
2. Building on the point above, the advantage is that there is plenty of room to apply yourself and learn. However, many projects require cross-departmental collaboration, and testing and adjustment take a great deal of time and communication. When time is tight, achieving a perfect result is extremely difficult.
3. More than 87% of messages in communication-app group chats require an immediate response and handling. The Pomodoro Technique cannot be used at this company; it depends on whether the individual can accept this.
There’s a snack bar, fruit days, and occasional free treats.
1. Very large requirements are assigned with unreasonable timelines.
2. The schedule changes constantly, and you have to argue back and forth about it.
3. You can’t ask about overtime pay on weekdays; you’ll get fired. Someone previously asked about it and was fired the following week, leaving the entire company team in a state of anxiety.
4. Upper management thinks coding is just copying and pasting, as if Java and JavaScript were the same language.
5. Some projects don’t use a RESTful API architecture and instead use custom frameworks. Once those are completed, they rush the frontend engineers’ progress.
6. It’s relatively difficult to learn things here. What you can learn more readily is bureaucratic culture. Don’t expect to learn much technically; you have to try new things yourself and see whether you decide to introduce them.
7. You can’t speak directly; you have to use insinuations. You can’t directly point out blind spots and disrupt the company’s superficial harmony, or your supervisor will call you in for a meeting.
8. The salary is actually average, but it’s somewhat better compared with other companies. You won’t earn much, but you won’t starve either.
9. They really like unrealistic development expectations. Sometimes they talk as if they hope a project can be developed by the next day. They have this mindset even when they know they’ve assigned something complex. The idea of going from 0% progress to 100% the next day is highly impractical. Engineers have a very low status at this company.
10. They don’t pay overtime for weekday overtime. To receive overtime pay, there must be an official justification. Management’s definition is that you voluntarily work overtime because you want to get things done well, so they don’t proactively provide overtime pay. If you insist, what happened in point 3 may happen to you.
11. A flat organization? Not flat at all. If you report to higher management over your supervisor’s head, upper management will feel that you are disrespecting your supervisor. The hierarchy is very obvious: a supervisor is a supervisor. A supervisor’s demands and arbitrary changes are considered reasonable, while the requests of people below are considered unreasonable.
12. Returning to point 3: after firing someone, they held a meeting to tell the engineers that they had no intention of using people up before laying them off. Basically, anyone with eyes, ideas, and the ability to think would not see it that way.
13. They say you can freely express yourself, but that’s completely false. They’re just trying to portray themselves as a happy company. Give me a break.
The company has a lively, upbeat atmosphere and a flat organizational structure. People with ideas have a high chance of putting them into practice.
Compared with the salaries offered to new employees in the tech industry, the pay is average. It is suitable for beginners to gain experience.
The interviewer this time was the marketing manager (apparently born in 1988?), who presented herself as highly experienced in using online tools. She was very talkative throughout the interview, seemed very friendly, and kept smiling and laughing...
During the interview questions, I discovered that a whole lot of the interviewer's claimed experience actually came from other people. It was either based on things she had heard or know-how gained from feedback given by her colleagues (presumably subordinates?). Then, whenever I asked about more professional concepts, she would just dodge the question...
Next, the interviewer emphasized that 518 operates under a responsibility-based system with no overtime pay (so even a job board can be an exploitative employer?). She also said that everyone gets along very well at work, and that because they are around the same age, they enjoy learning from one another. She said the company is also very willing to let employees pursue learning opportunities, and even gave the example that employees can work on project management outside their core responsibilities (does that mean serving as a PM?). I felt that toward the end, the interviewer kept emphasizing how much they value teamwork, because everyone is one big family. She then asked whether I liked joining dinners or other group activities after work, etc. I thought they were free and happily said, “Of course!” But after asking more carefully... I only then found out that these activities are all self-funded!!!!!! (Then I don't understand why she brought up these questions about activities that require employees to pay during the interview. Is this also included in the work performance KPI? After hearing that, I had already crossed her off in my mind.)
After listening to the entire interview.... I felt that the interviewer must be a masked superhero, because what she said felt extremely unreal and too superficial.
Finally, when discussing the job's compensation, she said the company's starting salary is 40,000 or more (surprisingly high compared with the answer I got from a friend earlier! My friend said their starting salaries are all in the thirty-thousands~). Then the interviewer said that the salary would be adjusted according to ability after three full months (huh! Is this a probationary period?).
Conclusion:
A manager with no experience who relies solely on talking— even if they offered me 50,000, I still wouldn't dare join... Usually, people like this will exploit their subordinates' know-how to the fullest, and then work their subordinates to death....? (Terrifying)
Thank you! No need to contact me!
I politely declined! BYE~ XD
1. Large premises; the office environment is very much like a café.
2. Partner taxis are available for transportation when going out on business.
3. There is a snack area: There is little variety, restocking is slow, and everything is snatched up within a minute of being put out.
4. It is a good place for university graduates to pass through as a stepping stone.
1. Low salary: Although it is a listed company, base salaries are generally low, and the so-called raises make little to no difference.
2. Poor benefits: The benefits are mainly for long-serving employees. You need to have worked there for a certain number of years to receive year-end bonuses, dividends, travel allowances, and other benefits. The key point is that the so-called “benefits fund” is still deducted from your salary every month.
3. There are unspoken overtime rules: Managers really like holding meetings after work, e.g., quarterly meetings.
They also like asking everyone to go out for meals or karaoke, using employees as extras to create the illusion of harmony.
4. No overtime pay: Managers expect every employee to demonstrate their devotion to the company. If a vendor is only available to meet in the evening, you will still be asked to go, but there is no overtime pay—only three hours of compensatory leave the following morning.
5. Unspoken rules about meals: At noon, you must eat with a group of colleagues you are not familiar with. If you do not join them, your manager will “check in” and ask what has been happening with you lately.
6. Unspoken rules about company activities: Whenever the company holds an activity, you must clear your schedule and attend. If you do not participate, you will be considered not a team player and will make the manager lose face—for example, Family Day held on a weekend.
7. Managers are as good as nonexistent: Someone mentioned in a review that managers generally earn their positions through seniority. Damn right~ If you are more capable than your manager, they will revise your proposal into their own version and submit it to upper management. They get the credit, you take the responsibility, and in the end they will even find a way to make you leave.
8. The data is not genuine: Whenever a new feature goes live, managers will ask colleagues to help post favorable reviews and high ratings. If netizens leave negative comments, the backend system automatically blocks them.
9. Employees are treated like clowns: At year-end banquets and company gatherings, you must come up with activities, just like playing group games at university—riddles, dancing, and games. For birthday celebrations, managers require everyone, whether they are close to the birthday person or not, to celebrate with them. The birthday person must be pranked before they are allowed to leave.
10. Everyone has potential as a project planner: The duties you perform after joining may differ from the position you interviewed for. Managers believe everyone has the potential to be a project planner, so regardless of your position—including design and engineering—you may be assigned to a project-planning role after joining.
01: Snacks are available (but not every day, and restocking is very slow).
02: The company welcomes people who value the company more than their family.
03: This company may be suitable for recent university graduates or people looking for internships.
Company benefits:
01. You generally only find out after joining the company; externally, the company consistently claims that the year-end bonus is two months’ salary.
The facts are: (less than one year: calculated by day; one year: one month; two years or more: two months)
Work experience:
01: Most people at the managerial level obtained their positions through seniority. Few were promoted because of extensive experience in the role or effective leadership.
02: The management lacks SOPs; the manager’s word is the decision (project execution and decision-making transparency: 0).
03: People who dislike acting alone or prefer working with a few close colleagues may not fit in, because the company prefers group activities, and those who do not cooperate will be checked on.
04: The company likes organizing group activities (whether this is good or bad depends on personal preference). Regardless of the size of the activity, those who do not participate must fill out a form to report it and also report to their supervisor.
1. The company's management is very pragmatic and focused on the business itself, without too much political maneuvering.
2. If you want to learn how to develop online products, this would be a good choice.
3. There are abundant resources and plenty of room to make an impact, provided that you are self-motivated and creative.
1. The company has an unwritten expectation of working overtime and tends to have strict management. Simply put, you are expected to cooperate with the team to meet targets and push ahead—a typical mainland Chinese management style.
2. Being pragmatic is good, but sometimes the company relies on established approaches to its business, which instead limits exposure to other people and things in the industry.
3. The workforce is lean, providing plenty of room to make an impact, but the workload is also heavy, so be mentally prepared to work overtime.
4. Employees also have to take turns cleaning the office; whether you can accept this is a personal matter...
Occasionally there are small snacks to eat
591.8591.8891 All departments are in mainland China, so don't even dream of learning anything there. Relying on being a large company, the salaries are all very low.
The work environment is good, and the colleagues are nice. The benefits are average, but there is reportedly a salary increase system.
The position I applied for was a design role. The work processes were defined very chaotically, and there was little precedent for many tasks. Props and equipment were also extremely inadequate. Basically, the company is still in its pioneering stage. If you really want to learn things or start from scratch, this is a good place to hone your skills. However, if you cannot accept this kind of environment or tolerate the company’s poorly defined processes, do not apply to this company...