Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesThe interviewer is not a Han Kuo-yu supporter
A week before I was due to start, they suddenly said they could no longer hire anyone because the budget was insufficient. Strange—if you didn’t have enough budget, why did you post the position in the first place? Do you enjoy treating people like idiots? You might as well have just said that a parachuted-in candidate was going to take the position. Otherwise, having an employment offer only gives people more room for speculation.
What’s more, a week before I was due to start, HR informed me that I didn’t need to report for work after all, claiming that the department’s budget was insufficient and that they could not hire someone without experience to work there. Then what you said initially was a lie. I had also stated during the interview that I had no experience. This is the first company I’ve encountered that was so lacking in integrity and treated job seekers like idiots.
Basically, the company has hardly any advantages.
The manager is extremely short-sighted.
The performance evaluation system is absurd. Across the entire company, the ratio of involuntary departures is higher than that of voluntary resignations.
All you can say about the manager is that they joined the company earlier than others; in terms of ability, they are just occupying a position as a spacer.
For employees who leave involuntarily, HR pretends to kindly give you advice about your next job, but the real purpose is merely to eliminate the unreasonable aspects of this company.
The company requires employees to improve their capabilities and work quality, yet provides no comprehensive training resources.
The products designed have no aesthetic appeal; it feels like the attitude is simply that this is good enough.
The company’s air conditioning is extremely cold. While it is summer outside, indoors feels like winter, and you need to wear a jacket.
Even when you work hard, your manager does not recognize that you are being proactive.
The benefits the company offers are available at other companies as well, so they do not count as an advantage.
1. The company is divided into two types of people: those who leave work on time and those who work overtime until dawn.
2. The company does not prioritize the timeliness of customer needs. For example, if an assessment says a correction can be completed in three days, it almost always takes more than a month from receiving the request to release.
3. The RD team often works itself to the bone. Four or five people in one department may work overtime simultaneously, and finishing at 1 or 2 a.m. is considered early.
4. QA does not clearly understand the requirements and tests randomly. The tests often concern issues outside the original requirements, and they even get the key points wrong when asking questions.
5. The young managers make immature decisions, demonstrating problems with their capabilities.
6. The probationary evaluation judges whether an employee passes solely based on the questions answered in the test; their work ability and performance are treated as if they were completely irrelevant.
7. Managers often talk nonsense in the office.
8. The company claims to operate at a fast pace, but the staff cannot keep up, making execution quite slow.
9. The company says it has an app product, but after joining, you discover that the “app” is merely the web version formatted for display on a mobile phone, not a native app.
1. Monthly group meals
2. Afternoon tea and fruit every week
1. The supervisor’s work attitude leaves you no time to grow; you are expected to immediately master all of the company’s systems
2. Whether you pass the probationary period is assessed through short-answer exam questions
3. The standards for marking exam questions do not align with the standards for passing the assessment
4. Other colleagues cannot be consulted to answer questions about the difficulty of the exam questions or the answers
5. Some colleagues frequently work overtime, working from midnight until dawn
6. The RD and QA teams lack technical ability and have no basic common sense at all
7. The company does not assign people to work that matches their strengths; many people’s job responsibilities are exactly the same
8. The company turns a blind eye to capable employees
Probably only when having afternoon tea.
Poor quality of supervisors
Poor quality of staff
Poor quality of the system
......
......
......
......
......
Hmm... is there anything good left?
……
The most __ manager I've ever encountered, without a doubt
X
Don’t come.... This supervisor.....
Um...
It seems like there are quite a lot...
Think twice before coming....