安捷管理顧問股份有限公司

There are absolutely no advantages to speak of. If the interview experience feels okay at the time, that is just an illusion! Don’t be fooled by the false impression they create in the moment! You will definitely regret joining the company!

The less-experienced colleagues are generally easy enough to get along with.

The more senior ones (especially those with high-ranking titles) are extremely hypocritical! Be careful!

This company really likes designing “e-cards, social media covers, posts, promotional materials for restaurants/properties/usage…” The general manager and the chairman are basically equal in authority! Unless both of them agree, you cannot complete anything!

The key point is that they will not tell you why they disagree or dislike something. They will just make you revise it until you are completely worn out! They think their ideas are brilliant, and that you are useless and incapable of understanding what they want! Even when they finally deign to explain their ideas a little, there is still a 99.9% chance that you have to figure out the rest yourself!

This company is often reported by employees for violating laws and regulations, but it never seriously faces its own problems. It first assumes that employees are causing trouble and always treats the symptoms rather than addressing the root cause.

Bringing in an auditor does not actually result in a genuine audit; it insults the very essence of auditing.

They bring in a planning manager but do not adopt the planning manager’s ideas, making the position effectively meaningless. It is merely a person to serve as an outlet for venting and to prove how superior they are. The general manager and chairman always think their own ideas are the ultimate authority!

They also think other people’s designs are terrible (whether created by internal employees or outsourced designers). The general manager and chairman always think their own designs are top-notch.

The secretary is also quite pitiful. Every time there is a meaningless meeting, the secretary has to help all the departments with their work, making it feel as though every department is incompetent and only the secretary can do things properly. The key point is that you often see the secretary being reprimanded as well—it is a terrible, thankless job.

The office is dim and lacks vitality.

The chairman likes to use “cost savings” as a reason to skip the formal approval process for certain decisions, claiming it saves time and administrative costs. Afterwards, with nothing in writing, the person responsible for implementation is pitifully left exhausted and in a miserable state.

Anyway, the list of grievances is endless…

None at all

Terrible, absolutely terrible!!!

No benefits whatsoever

Anyone thinking of joining should think carefully

Don’t say you weren’t warned

You’ll only regret it after you get in…

You’ll only regret it after you get in…

You’ll only regret it after you get in…

(It’s very important, so I’m saying it three times)

The interview came with a cup of tea, and that was it.

The interview was unprofessional from start to finish.

Besides requiring applicants to complete an old-fashioned personality test, they didn’t even print out the portfolio that applicants had been asked to provide in advance, demonstrating a serious lack of professionalism in the interview process.

It’s understandable that HR may not be familiar with the expertise required for the position being interviewed for, but they kept making intimidating remarks about how there might be a lot of work to do, that it would be an all-in-one role, and that they would be very busy.

Who would still want to join after hearing all that?

None

The first interview was with the HR manager. Because the internal résumé form was missing salary information, they spent 10 minutes rambling about it. By the time they finished, I just wanted to end the interview and leave.

The second interview was with an assistant vice president. They smelled strongly of cigarettes, but were a nice person.

I didn’t make it to the chairman; the result was simply a silent rejection.

The colleagues are all pretty nice,

but when it comes to work, they all keep passing the buck.

The boss likes to change everything—copywriting, design, marketing (even policing Facebook emojis). I really don’t understand why they hire employees at all. Finally, after making the changes to meet the boss’s expectations, the boss will still sarcastically tear them apart, going on about how creative and amazing they are.

Then the general manager will show up and say he doesn’t think it’s very good, leading to another round of changes and revisions.

Watching the two bosses make changes back and forth, they will eventually join forces to mock the employees for being so incompetent that they made the two of them keep changing things.

Most of the colleagues are quite nice!

The chairman always thinks that his ideas are better than everyone else’s and speaks in a very sarcastic manner.

He likes to focus on the details of the wording, so he does not delegate authority to the people responsible for execution.

There is also a general manager in between, so something revised by the chairman may then be disliked by the general manager and need to be revised again.

Therefore, the closer you are to senior management in communication, the more difficult the work becomes.

People in some positions either do not stay for long or leave as soon as they feel something is wrong.

Think carefully before joining.

The colleagues are all very easy to get along with

The boss is completely a very difficult person to deal with

Employees often have to guess what exactly the boss is thinking

Something can be revised an unlimited number of times, with the general manager also involved in the process

If the general manager doesn’t like it, you have to start all over again, and then get told it’s your own problem?

If your position requires frequent interaction with the boss,

please think twice

The HR and secretary were very nice.

I waited a long time for the interview and was asked many questions.

There were three rounds; the final round was with the chairman.

The chairman was difficult to deal with, had a sour expression, and spoke unpleasantly.

The 90-minute lunch break lets me catch up on sleep.

The boss complains if you leave on time, and there’s no overtime pay.

The weekly meetings have no focus; I’m really good at being lulled to sleep by empty talk.

They keep dragging things out without reaching a conclusion; changing their minds is commonplace.

Aspiring warriors who wish to train and temper their will are welcome.