This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesProduction Technology/Process Engineer
One person is used as three (production technology, quality assurance, and maintenance), allowing you to quickly accumulate relevant experience.
The basic arithmetic and logic questions involving addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division were fine.
Then there was another section involving judgment questions, and multiple answers could be selected.
They were similar to AbdD, AdbD, AbaD, AbdD; the characters were small and densely packed,
and you had to quickly select the answer.
Then another large section involved correctly identifying shapes, which I simply did not have time to finish.
(I think the company may often get the serial numbers wrong when shipping products, which is why they gave this test.)
You are expected to properly do the work of three people while receiving only one person's salary.
They asked about the purpose and allocation of each month's expenses. Were they trying to find out whether the applicant had debts?
I mentioned that in the future, I hoped to have opportunities for advancement toward management positions,
but the vice president seemed not to agree with this idea.
My interpretation of the vice president's thinking is that the "Production Technology/Process Engineer" position has no prospects for advancement in the future;
to put it plainly, the salary would not be increased any further.
Production Technology/Process Engineer
One person is used as three people (production technology, quality assurance, and maintenance), allowing you to quickly accumulate relevant experience.
The basic arithmetic and logical calculations—addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division—were fine.
Then there was another major section involving judgment questions, and multiple answers could be selected.
They were things like AbdD, AdbD, AbaD, AbdD; the text was small and densely packed.
You had to quickly select the answer.
Then another large section involved correctly identifying figures, which I simply did not have time to finish.
(I think the company may often mix up serial numbers when shipping products, which is why this test was given.)
You are expected to effectively do the work of three people while receiving only one person's salary.
They asked about the purposes and allocation of my monthly expenses. I suppose they wanted to understand whether job applicants have debts?
I mentioned that in the future, I hoped to have opportunities for advancement and to move toward a management position.
However, the vice president seemed not to agree with this idea.
My interpretation of the vice president's thinking is that the "Production Technology/Process Engineer" position will remain this way in the future, with no prospects for development.
To put it plainly, the salary will not be increased any further either.
Production Technology/Process Engineer
One person is used as three people (production technology, quality assurance, and maintenance), allowing you to quickly accumulate relevant experience.
The basic logical calculations—addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division—were fine.
Then there was another section involving judgment, and multiple answers could be selected.
It was something like AbdD, AdbD, AbaD, AbdD; the text was small and dense,
and you had to quickly select the answer.
Then there was another large section involving the correct identification of shapes, which I simply did not have time to finish.
(I think the company may often mix up serial numbers when shipping products, which is why this test was given.)
You are expected to do the work of three people well while receiving only one person’s salary.
They asked about the purpose and allocation of each month’s expenses. Were they trying to find out whether the applicant had debts?
I mentioned that I hoped to have opportunities to advance in the future and move toward a management position,
but the vice president seemed not to agree with this idea.
My interpretation of the vice president’s thinking is that the “Production Technology/Process Engineer” position will remain this way in the future, with no room for development.
To put it plainly, the salary will not be increased any further.
Production Technology / Process Engineer
One person is used as three people (production technology, quality assurance, and maintenance), quickly accumulating relevant experience.
The basic calculations involving the four arithmetic operations are fine.
Then there was another section involving judgment, and multiple answers could be selected.
For example, options like AbdD, AdbD, AbaD, and AbdD—the text was small and densely arranged,
so you had to choose the answer quickly.
The final large section involved correctly identifying figures, which I simply did not have time to finish.
(I think the company may often mix up serial numbers when shipping products, which is why this test was given.)
You are expected to properly do the work of three people while receiving only one person's salary.
They asked about the purposes and allocation of my monthly expenses. Were they trying to find out whether job applicants have debt?
I mentioned that I hoped to have opportunities for advancement in the future and move toward a management position.
However, the vice president seemed not to agree with this idea.
My interpretation of the vice president's thinking is that the "Production Technology / Process Engineer" position has no prospects for future development and will simply remain as it is.
To put it plainly, the salary will not be increased any further.