Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesThere is a birthday celebration every month
The female manager has an extremely high opinion of herself and suffers from a severe princess syndrome.
She is arrogant and even dares to loudly argue with the boss in front of all the employees.
However, whenever a subordinate offers an opinion or kindly reminds her of something, she becomes furious and tries to save face by shouting loudly.
She has very poor emotional control, is easily angered at others, bullies the weak while fearing the strong, and takes advantage of those who are easy to push around.
Working under her means having to follow her standards in everything, even though she herself is a person with double standards.
She is dissatisfied with everyone and only praises herself when she is "educating" her subordinates.
It just goes to show that people raised on the same rice can still be very different... So what if someone graduated from the most prestigious university? They do not even understand basic manners.
You really should keep your distance from this kind of person.
The colleagues are all quite nice, and the benefits are standard.
The company’s highest authority is controlled by a female manager (usually the person who interviewed you). This manager is extremely subjective, treats everyone as if they were idiots, and likes to act like a queen.
If you are an individualistic person with your own ideas, you may not be a good fit here. She likes people who obediently do as she says and do not talk back. It is impossible to discuss matters objectively, and if the outcome is contrary to the direction she gave, she will immediately play dumb and shift the blame! If she does not like you, she will pick on you over everything you do, followed by suddenly getting rid of you. This company is very suitable for people who can swallow their frustrations and are good at flattering others!
Harmonious relationships among colleagues
The manager in charge
Her tone is often very rude, highly emotional, and filled with negativity.
She likes to yell loudly and loses her temper over the smallest things.
She really likes to dwell on matters that are not important.
She requires every email to be printed out for her and checks it line by line with her subordinates.
Sometimes, even after she has been given a black-and-white printout, she insists on printing another copy in color herself,
as if she were unable to do her work unless it had been printed out.
If a certain email is accidentally not printed and given to her, she gets angry.
Then she can justifiably yell loudly at her subordinate: “You need to be more flexible in your thinking.”
Wish: If this company did not have her in it, the air would immediately become fresher.
The company was originally named "康筌有限公司" and changed its name to "康筌國際股份有限公司" in 2018.
(This is how it is described on 104.)
Interview experience:
1. After sitting down, the employee who escorted me to my seat asked whether I would like water or tea, which showed considerable courtesy toward the job candidate.
2. The interviewer was a female manager who spoke very politely and repeatedly thanked me for coming to the company for an interview.
3. There was no written test. The entire interview consisted of questions about why I left my previous job, my views on work, and so on. She seemed to be a manager who was very willing to listen to the interviewee.
1. The position follows a responsibility-based work system, with frequent overtime, and the products are complex. I got the impression that previous new hires had difficulty taking over the work or adapting, so the interviewer kept asking about and expressing concern over my willingness to pursue this position.
2. The interview took place in early February. The interviewer said that because they were still interviewing new candidates, they would not decide on the result until the end of February. She asked me, if I were hired, what the earliest date I could start would be. I answered that I could start at any time, but the interviewer said, "Don't you need to take some time to rest first?" (I had left my previous job only the day before the interview.) Later, the interviewer said, "Then I'll note that you can start in mid-March..." It felt like an excuse indicating that they had no intention of hiring me; otherwise, why would they delay the decision for so long?