This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesColleagues get along well, with no backstabbing. The company benefits are quite good, including bonuses for the three major holidays and travel allowances. The company fully complies with the Labor Standards Act.
It’s okay; it depends on the individual’s perspective, and people’s levels of acceptance differ.
My colleagues are all easy to get along with, and there is no backstabbing.
The bonuses for the three major holidays are always provided and never omitted.
As long as you do your own work and complete assigned tasks, you can leave on time. There is no toxic culture of mandatory overtime.
You need to work efficiently.
The interview environment was good, the staff responsible for reception were quite courteous, and I was able to speak openly about my thoughts. The salary and benefits seemed pretty good too!
The test materials were somewhat difficult. I hope I get the job!
The three annual bonuses are quite good
The boss is generous with rewards for those who work hard
The company operates very steadily. There is no need to worry about the company being unable to pay salaries
The job is highly challenging; those who do not enjoy improving themselves may not be able to handle it
None
This interview was for a production operations technician position in Pingtung.
This interview experience was extremely disappointing. From the moment I stepped into the office, the interviewer displayed an extremely arrogant and contemptuous attitude, repeatedly emphasizing how “high-end” the company’s hierarchy was and how stringent its requirements for talent were.
However, when the discussion turned to the specific job duties and compensation, the situation was completely different:
Extremely heavy workload: The scope of responsibilities seemed vague and all-encompassing, with the expected pressure and responsibility completely matching the “high-end” image described by the interviewer.
Concerning salary: For such demanding work, the offered salary was only $29,500, which did not even strike a balance with basic living standards and the value of professional expertise.
Respecting talent should not be merely a slogan. If the company considers itself high-end, it should demonstrate a corresponding professional attitude and offer reasonable compensation, rather than trying to use a sense of superiority to package cheap labor. Future interviewees are advised to confirm the salary range before the interview to avoid wasting valuable time.
Relationships among colleagues are okay.
The boss keeps changing decisions from one moment to the next. If you don't have a high-level degree, you have no say, and the boss doesn't trust you.
They love locking company access permissions at the slightest thing, making it impossible to work.
The boss is the company's biggest drawback.
It probably won't be easy to whitewash the reviews anymore either.
None
The shortcomings mentioned above still haven’t been improved after all these years.
This company still has to come here to clean up its reviews itself.
That says it all.
It’s easy to claim unemployment benefits.
The boss is suspicious by nature, says one thing and changes it the next day, and is also emotional.
He’s probably the company’s biggest drawback, lol.
Even Hsiao Huang-chi can see that people at this company are fabricating positive reviews.
Thanks to the people who commented previously, I was discouraged from applying.
Extremely high turnover, so you can meet lots of new people
A retirement home environment, being eliminated...
Trains stress tolerance and logical thinking; if you fail to meet the standards, it is absolutely because you lack the ability, never because the supervisor made the wrong decision
Let your brain rest—do whatever the supervisor says and does, but if the result is unsatisfactory, it is all your fault
Zero drawbacks, absolutely wonderful—come apply for an interview!
Colleagues get along well.
The company only has one problem: the boss keeps changing decisions, so everyone ends up doing meaningless work, which has kept the company from growing. The performance bonus rules are constantly being changed. If you're considering coming here to work in sales, think carefully—very carefully.
The employee benefits are good, colleagues get along well, and you can leave work on time. Overtime is rare!
If you want to slack off, this is not the place for you!
The three annual bonuses aren’t particularly large, but they do show sincerity. You hardly need to use your brain at work—it’s practically a place to coast into retirement.
The boss is conceited and thinks he knows everything. He didn’t study nutrition, yet he tries to direct the R&D and nutritionists professionally; he didn’t study business, yet he tells marketing how to promote products; reportedly having worked in sales, he instructs the sales team in ways that offend clients and then shifts the blame onto them; he didn’t study industrial engineering, yet he insists on designing the factory’s partitioning and pipeline layout himself, and it still isn’t finished after more than three years.
He keeps blaming employees for failing to sell the products, but there isn’t even a factory, and he won’t provide a single photo—how are we supposed to promote anything? He always acts superior, as if he understands everything and is the ultimate professional, issuing ignorant commands that make people want to laugh. What’s shameful isn’t his ignorance, but the foolishness of being so concerned with saving face.
He is very afraid that employees will have nothing to do, so he often demands useless reports or surveys. He provides no resources and refuses to spend any money, yet still expects marketing to be done. He is very impatient and likes to interfere in everything, but he never takes the time to understand the situation. He immediately gives orders, refuses to listen to explanations, and makes things worse. To save face, he insists on handling matters his incorrect way, then later blames employees for not handling things properly.
The company has been operating for 30 years, but its scale has never been able to grow. Compared with competitors that have been in business for 10 years, the gap is enormous. There are probably only two employees who have been here for more than 10 years. The people in truly important roles—R&D and sales—are generally replaced with a new group about every two years. Their management skills are genuinely impressive: there is always a cheaper batch of fresh recruits.
Colleagues are easy to get along with
The manager lacks judgment, acts only from their own perspective, does not respect the market, and focuses only on trivial matters
The manager's mood is extremely unpredictable
The turnover rate among sales staff is extremely high, and the bonus rules are changed arbitrarily
No salary adjustment after the probationary period, despite verbally promising during the interview that there would be one
Does not respect the expertise of R&D personnel; when problems arise afterward, blames R&D for lacking ability, insisting that the decision itself was not wrong
Think carefully! Think carefully!
There are quite a lot of drawbacks.
Job seekers, please think carefully~ Think carefully~ Think carefully~
As for the policies, all I can say is:
“All conditioned phenomena are like dreams, illusions, bubbles, and shadows; like dew and lightning. They should be regarded as such.”
The same matter can be described one way this minute and in a completely different way the next—the difference can be like that between heaven and earth.
Internal staff:
Every company inevitably has people who look sour, speak harshly, and are also very lazy; this public office is no exception. There is a certain woman who only knows how to push things off onto others (everything is someone else’s responsibility), has a very unpleasant expression (as if the whole world owes her something), and everyone in the company knows about it—yet she can still continue working there... You can imagine what that means.
Field staff:
I have to say that the colleagues get along harmoniously, but those working on the front line face policies that can change at any moment (A today, B tomorrow...), while their bonuses keep getting reduced... Because of policy issues, they not only get berated by customers, but also have their pay deducted......
There is so much I want to say. If anyone who happens to read this could share what I have missed, I would be truly grateful.
Although I really wanted to give the worst possible rating, I could only select “Poor.” All job seekers, for the sake of your future, please consider this carefully~
Because the entire company has only one problem, everyone gets along very well.
Managers often change their minds from one day to the next and have poor decision-making skills.
They tell you one thing, but after you do as instructed, they turn around, deny responsibility, and blame you.
They paint a beautiful picture but never consider the company’s limitations.
If something cannot meet their standards, it is always because you are not capable enough—there is absolutely no possibility that their decision was wrong.
If you want to hone your patience with people and your ability to go with the flow, this is definitely a place worth trying.