This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesAs of November 2020, the company was "on the surface" fully compliant with the Labor Standards Act.
The work and benefits listed on 104 were also genuine. At least during my employment, I was not deprived of any benefits.
The relationships among colleagues were fairly harmonious, as long as work-related matters were not involved.
The benefits were all quite good.
1. The boss says he wants to reform things—please do not take him seriously; he is fishing for information.
2. As of November 2020, be cautious of Assistant Manager Li. If you are applying for a warehouse management position or a related role, just do what he says. If he asks for your opinion, respond vaguely and move on. If he feels that you are more aggressive or ambitious than he is, you will be targeted. Strictly speaking, I simply did not encounter the right supervisor. I hope the next person who joins this company can work there peacefully and harmoniously, instead of foolishly getting targeted like I did.
3. If you are applying for a position in the Production Department, be aware that there is a fine system within this department. This violates the Labor Standards Act. If you encounter similar unlawful practices after being hired, quietly collect evidence and protect your rights.
4. In 2020, business conditions were poor. The boss wanted to cut staff, while the boss's wife wanted to hire people. They occasionally came into conflict over how to run things. If you join the company, you may need to watch out for some strange conflicts and avoid getting caught up in them.
Salaries are paid on time, with regular all-you-can-eat group meals (just go and eat—there’s no pressure to socialize); some departments also have all-you-can-drink beverages. The facilities, such as the restrooms, pantry, and meeting rooms, are like those in an office, and the dining areas are comfortable and practical.
At the spring banquet, the raffle prizes are ten thousand, twenty thousand, and thirty thousand [NTD], satisfying everyone’s taste for gambling. It’s quite exciting and gets everyone fired up—the time each year when I’m most satisfied to be employed.
The boss’s judgment about where money should be spent, and about which people should be cut and which shouldn’t, is really very different from what junior employees think.
For the annual perfect-attendance award, in addition to the money, they also give out a small trophy that I can’t tell whether it’s acrylic or glass. It isn’t environmentally friendly and takes up space; wouldn’t replacing it with fifty or one hundred dollars be better?
They don’t want ordinary employees, so senior employees have begun taking on two, three, four, or five roles at once. Salaries increase slowly by one hundred, two hundred, five hundred, or one thousand. You could give someone an immediate raise of ten or twenty thousand, but it seems the boss thinks that if the person is driven away, it’s more cost-effective to hire two or three rookies at minimum wage to fill the gap.
Senior executives can only express, in spirit, that they know you’re working hard; they have no authority to approve raises. On the one hand, they also lack the ability—or don’t know how—to persuade the boss to provide more staff, while on the other hand they want to be good children who solve things themselves.
The top management looks at your reports and naturally thinks, “Well, you’re operating pretty well, so why should we give you resources?”
The people at the bottom are worked to death.
All the systems that should originally have existed were in place, and the future looked bright.
Staff reductions and employees leaving without being able to complete a proper handover have made normal operations impossible.
It feels like a case of short-term thinking and immediate gains, resulting in the loss of the advantages built through years of hard work.
Is the transformation deliberate or just willful?
Carefully considered or impulsive?
The entrepreneurs of this generation
probably had it too easy when they first made their money.
During the interview, the HR representative was polite and provided clear information, answering questions as much as possible.
However, the supervisor’s attitude during the interview was rather casual.
All the benefits mentioned during the interview were provided.
The warehouse supervisors are genuinely terrible—one surnamed Fang and one surnamed Li.
They do not accomplish much, lack a sense of responsibility and accountability, and constantly shirk responsibility.
The one surnamed Li takes credit for subordinates’ achievements.
The tea ranges from 0.1 to 70 kilograms, so a large amount of heavy lifting is required. The warehouse is next to the production line and extremely hot.
One item may be divided into several types of processing, increasing the burden on the warehouse.
This company is harsh toward production-line workers: there is a lot of work, little pay, and heavy lifting is also required.
After working there for two or three years, I do not recommend coming to work in this warehouse for the following reasons:
Low pay, extreme heat, and a small warehouse (it is impossible to cook without ingredients).
Heavy lifting (it is normal to move several tons in a day; there are only manual pallet jacks, while the electric equipment is reserved for others).
The elevator is in poor condition and there is only one, so a lot of time is spent waiting for it.
You have to flatter the boss; I have seen people who did not flatter him subsequently get fired, regardless of their work ability.
They are even harsher toward foreign workers and production-line employees.
The warehouse supervisors are 100% smiling assassins; when asked to do something, they cannot do it.
The employee turnover rate is high.
As long as you know how to flatter the one surnamed Li, he will protect you no matter how bad you are.
Employed for less than a month. The company feels like a very large-scale organization.
The position is a material-feeding machinery operation technician.
The work environment feels somewhat less than ideal.
It feels like someone is constantly watching you work.
I heard there are many surveillance cameras? It makes one feel somewhat uncomfortable while working. Although there is still training for new employees, it feels like there is not much concern for newcomers... Overall, I feel that leaving was the right decision.
Completely complies with the Labor Standards Act,
is my favorite among all the companies I have worked for,
and this is truly a company where you can stay for a long time.
I would not deny the good qualities of a company because of one bad manager,
but unfortunately, the manager of the department I worked in was not very good at leading people.
As long as your performance was not very good, he would go to great lengths to try to get rid of you,
even if you had just joined the company and had not yet settled into your role.
Although there would be a honeymoon period,
it still depended on the manager’s mood.
As soon as you made a mistake, he would criticize you in the group chat,
so there was not much room for making mistakes.
None
They deliberately pressure you to do other things after your working hours. If you don’t comply, they’ll dismiss you the very next day.