Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesHR was very proactive and enthusiastic, and came across as very friendly during the conversation.
The manager was very late to the second interview, to the point that I thought the interview had been canceled.
In the end, I had to urge HR to look into the situation before they told me that a technical issue had prevented them from connecting to the video call.
I had prepared and waited half an hour before the scheduled time, but it took nearly an hour for the other party to resolve the issue before the second interview could begin.
They asked many questions and also tested my English.
In the end, they rejected me with some arbitrary excuse.
Overall, the second interview was an extremely poor experience. It made me feel that if you are not actually hiring, you should not waste both parties' time conducting interviews.
To be fair, you can learn about things from the 1970s here. Executives often say: “The company is very wealthy, and the boss doesn’t care about this small amount of money at all.” As a result, people are not very serious about their work. The entire Xinshun Industrial Park, Xiefu Power Plant, 7 Jun Fumeixing, and Fuxin Securities belong to the boss, and he even holds equity in the Jiashan Farm in China, as well as Taiwan’s Eastern Broadcasting and China Airlines.
At the Vietnam plant, there is a local master craftsman who only graduated from elementary school and claims to have entered the workforce at the age of 13, but he does not understand the technology. Once, when the Vietnamese team’s development was nearing completion, he happened to get lucky and stumble upon the right solution. Unfortunately, Chairman Wu was completely taken in by him. Because the company is very closed, professional managers only want to make a little progress and use a few new terms to make Chairman Ding very happy.
The company’s senior executives use nominees to buy houses in Vietnam, while their actual jobs are merely a sideline. Every decision is made to bring down opposing factions.
Even when targets aren’t met, no one is held accountable. If you have thick enough skin, you can continue coasting indefinitely, but personally, I think it’s a waste of life.
The strategy at this company is for several old-timers to do nothing but collect a paycheck while treating new hires as expendable. Newcomers are specifically assigned difficult tasks or work that no one else is willing to do. If they succeed, the credit goes to the old-timers in management; if they fail, it’s simply the new hire who gets sacrificed. As a result, six people in the business unit resigned within two years.
As for the work itself, there is no onboarding training when you join and no handover when you leave. There are written rules in name only, but execution gets zero points. The staff’s professional competence is poor: people who are not good at English, cannot use Office, do not understand export sales, and have no relevant experience—including an animal keeper from a certain industrial park—can also work in sales. I don’t know what else to say.