晶偉電子股份有限公司

Hard to say

I advise checking the news using the company name

So happy to be leaving.

A company rife with sexual harassment.

Although it is a limited company, one person holds a dominant share, so whatever the boss says goes. Even when you follow his instructions, you may still get scolded; the company is performance-oriented, so it does not matter how poor someone’s character is as long as they perform well.

Suitable for people with vulgar character but good performance.

1. The interview discussion was quite good. The interviewing manager asked relevant questions and took notes, which made me feel that they were paying attention.

1. The boss asked new applicants to show their sincerity by providing a list of 30 prospective clients before joining the company.

2. After I returned the client list, HR replied by email that they would arrange the onboarding details as soon as possible after making revisions and adjustments, but I never received any further message.

3. HR said they would respond with the subsequent onboarding details before the end of the workday, but never did. A few days later, they called and rejected me, still citing their preference for someone with relevant experience.

A very disappointing interview experience.

None

I submitted my résumé, and HR replied asking about my height.

(Is this height discrimination against people of certain heights?)

I still told them my height at the time,

and even helped them think of a reason they hadn’t thought of themselves,

very humbly asking, “May I ask why you need to know my height?”

“If it’s due to concerns about clients’ perceptions,” I said, “I don’t mind wearing high heels every time I visit clients.”

HR replied, as expected: The supervisor had concerns about clients’ perceptions, which was why they asked about my height.

Actually, thinking about it, wasn’t the reason I suggested also discriminating against myself?

This company discriminates based on height. If clients happen to prefer looking at tall women or tall men, you should consider that the company does not protect you from the treatment you may receive when visiting clients outside the office.

The HR staff were very friendly, and the business manager proactively came over to say hello (during the break after the written test).

1. The interview process was lengthy, lasting two and a half hours in total. It included a 40-minute intelligence and logic test, an English typing test (which was actually typing product names and prices), a memory test, an interview with HR, and an interview with the manager.

2. HR said on the spot and also mentioned in a follow-up email that they would invite me to a second interview, but there was ultimately no follow-up at all. They would have been better off not mentioning it.

3. If you don't pass the intelligence test, you are asked to leave immediately.

The HR representative was kind and clearly explained the job requirements.

1. During the written test, employees of the company kept coming in and out of the office where the test was being held, disrupting the test.

2. The job posting indicated that no specific work experience or background was required, but HR only informed me during the on-site résumé screening that specific work experience and background were required, wasting both parties’ valuable time.

The interview process was all casual chatting. In short, the company is sales-oriented, so those applying for technical positions should take that into consideration.

I didn’t expect that.