This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesThe HR representative was polite.
They originally said that after the interview, they would notify me by email or phone regardless of whether I was hired.
However, after waiting for two weeks, I not only received no email or phone call, but the job posting on the recruitment website was directly closed.
It is hard to say whether a company that deceives interviewees like this might deceive them even more after they join...
HR was very polite
Don't go there.......
The low pay would be one thing,
but the female IT manager looks down on people.
That old hag....... hasn't been fucked in too long and is in a bad mood.
Luckily, she didn't take a liking to me; otherwise, that old hag would have fucked me like a dog.
General
I recently interviewed with the CIO and their HR team. HR got back to me today, and my overall impression was not very good. The first interview was held on Teams, and the second was in person at the company. Both conversations were quite long, and I felt that I was practically going to receive an offer. We briefly discussed salary during the first interview. The CIO said there was essentially a guaranteed 14 months of pay, but since it would not be written into the contract, she asked me to think it through carefully from a monthly-salary perspective. The CIO also said that if my salary range exceeded HR’s compensation approval level, she could directly approach the general manager to negotiate and make the decision. She spoke as though she had a high degree of autonomy and could bypass HR. So, when I went to the second interview last Friday, I raised my expected salary based on the monthly salary. The CIO replied that they could offer somewhere in the middle, approximately my expected salary minus 3,000 to 8,000. I felt that was acceptable. We also discussed that, because the commute is relatively long, she could accept a flexible start time of 9:30 a.m. at the latest. Regarding the start date, she preferred November or February, but said that starting after the Lunar New Year could also be discussed, including ways to coordinate on interim projects. She was willing to wait for a good candidate. But two days later, HR got back to me and said that flexible working hours were not possible, while insisting that I start before the end of the year and refusing to let me finish receiving my year-end bonus before joining… They asked me to assess whether I could accept this, but refused to provide the approved salary. How am I supposed to evaluate it!? This is a very important factor, okay!? After I asked them to provide the approved salary first so I could evaluate everything together, they replied in the afternoon—13K less directly!!? So everything the CIO had previously promised—the flexible start time of no later than 9:30, coordination of the start date, and the salary offered—was completely rejected and reversed by HR today!! When I asked about the CIO’s position, it seemed to have changed to “HR has the final say”… They said it was unlikely that I could demand a high salary, start late, and wait until after receiving my year-end bonus to join, as if I wanted to have it all. That’s ridiculous. Of these three points, which one did you actually agree to or coordinate with me!?? What exactly did I agree to!? The salary alone is 13K less than what the CIO promised! Are you messing with people!?? If HR has the final say on salary approval, then what exactly is the CIO there for—just to have fun??
None
Initially, the company’s CIO contacted me for an interview. We talked for one or two hours, and she asked how much salary I wanted. She said there was no guaranteed 14 months of pay, so I asked for N. She said she could offer me N+5.
After the interview, she emailed me questions about information on my résumé.
(Damn it—everything was already written in my 104 résumé and in the personnel information form the company asked me to fill out, but she didn’t read any of it beforehand and only looked at it after the interview??)
Two or three days later, the company’s HR called me and said that salary determination was HR’s job, and that the company did guarantee 14 months of pay—the CIO had misspoken.
HR said they would discuss my salary with the CIO again, but the next day they sent me a rejection notice through 104.
They didn’t even dare say, “Sorry, there was an error in our internal process that caused you inconvenience.”
I have no idea what the CIO and HR at this company are doing.
The CIO also said she had been there for two years… yet she didn’t even understand the company’s benefits or recruitment process.
HR was also very rude.
From all this, you can tell that this company is terrible and has no systems or procedures at all.
HR and the CIO are both making a mess of things.
None
The head of the Information Department makes deceptive statements and is a superior who plays word games.
Those who are considering joining should think it through carefully.
Integrity is still very important.
1. HR is concise and to the point
2. Personal analysis test
3. No need to provide too much information
1. The interview was conducted by two female supervisors, who asked about my private life.
2. They often make presumptions and dismiss you first, only saying you are good at the end.
3. It feels like you have to stay at another company for a long time before you qualify to enter or interview for a position in the electronics industry.
4. Is leaving every job after 2–3 years a way to improve your salary by changing jobs...? Nonsense. (Why not try if there is a better opportunity?)
5. I did not actively apply for this position, but the interviewers gave me the impression that they were extremely out of touch with reality.....
I hope the interviewers have a chance to see this article. If they had children of their own, and those children were capable of getting into Harvard, would they stop them and say that attending an ordinary university in Taiwan would be enough? It really is always someone else’s child who suffers.... I hope they do not hire me, otherwise I will confront the supervisor. Of course, thank you still for the interviewers’ opinions. I wish you success with your recruitment, and may everyone who joins be an elite.