This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelines1. Everything required under the Labor Standards Act is provided.
2. Salaries are paid on time.
1. Salaries are close to the minimum wage.
2. Management and supervisors’ thinking follow the standard traditional-manufacturing model.
3. The average age of colleagues is relatively high, and their way of thinking is more similar to that of our parents’ generation. They are not very likely to respect boundaries in interpersonal relationships.
None at all
Joined in February 2025 and left at the end of June.
Reason for leaving: I was bullied in the workplace. Everyone I encountered was very gossipy.
Employees deliberately formed cliques.
The supervisor did not intervene,
and even allowed the person leading it to slack off and do no work.
Because that person only wanted to collect a salary without doing any work, with none of the sense of responsibility expected of a supervisor.
There was an established culture in my work environment:
whenever someone resigned,
the supervisor would complain about you behind your back to other employees and shift the blame onto you.
A company with hardly any management systems. The upside is that even if you slack off, you won’t be laid off.
People who slack off will take advantage of newcomers or those who work seriously. They dump tasks on newcomers, but when there are benefits or credit to claim, they rush to grab them.
Managers are almost all the type who do nothing but talk and don’t take responsibility.
None
1. The job I applied for was at a warehouse in Taoyuan. During the interview, they said overtime was not mandatory, but if the work could not be finished, they would push it onto you.
2. I worked there for four days and already wanted to leave on the second day. There were too many terrible things, especially the section manager who interviewed and hired me.
1. A long-established company with all the benefits and protections required by the Labor Standards Act.
I applied for a warehouse position at the Taoyuan plant. During the interview, the supervisor (a section manager at the assistant manager level) made everything sound spectacular, giving the impression that he was highly capable. After being hired and working for a few days, I discovered that he was almost always nowhere to be found and did not understand the actual operations, seemingly leaving everything to the team leader below him. Then this team leader unexpectedly announced that he was resigning. I felt like I was being used as a scapegoat, so after four days, I decisively found an excuse to quit.
None
Small official, big authority! Giving me a show of power before I’ve even joined! Small official: Can you accept your supervisor talking to you using profanity? Applicant: Then can I hit you or sue you? I gave up on this lousy company after the interview! Taichung job opening
Applied for a Vietnam sales position. The interview process was quite amicable. The salary is 28K for the first three months in southern Taiwan; the compensation for assignment to Vietnam is unknown.
I haven't joined yet, so I'm not very clear about it.
Self-introduction + whether there are any questions
The longer the self-introduction seems to be, the better. They will keep asking whether you have any expertise that meets the requirements. It is best if you can provide certifications.
It is even better if you know how to use financial systems.
The interview process was quite enjoyable.
Construction nearby; smells can easily drift in.
An established company with decent benefits
No systems or structure; a traditional industry company
Family-owned company; promotion pathways are not very smooth, and many managers think from the employer’s perspective. The production and sales system has significant issues.