This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesNone
The HR person named Dolly was extremely incompetent. She asked me to fill out a form but then failed to send the form link. Even when providing the email link, she provided incomplete links twice. During the interview with the technical manager, before I had even finished speaking, HR would interrupt and rudely heckle me. They then said they would notify me of the result in two weeks. Two weeks later, there was no news, which would have been bad enough, but when I asked about the result, my message was read and left unanswered. Is it really that difficult to notify someone that they were not selected? The HR department at this company is truly beyond saving.
Management-level salaries are high (but don't even think about it—you won't get in or be promoted).
Women love to cry and men are afraid of dying—俗稱「愛哭怕死」.
The company is divided into a heaven zone and a hell zone; 104 only opens positions in the hell zone.
The heaven zone has people having extramarital affairs, sleeping all day at work, drawing high salaries without doing anything, and returning to the company after failing elsewhere to be promoted to management—various kinds of bizarre deadwood employees, guaranteed to make you feel like Granny Liu entering the Grand View Garden.
Fortunately, a few months ago an HR person came and vigorously “reorganized” the company, “reorganizing” away the people who were actually doing their jobs. Now the company is a picture of “prosperity.” She then walked away without taking responsibility: after wrecking the company, she resigned directly, took the title of “Chief Human Resources Officer” to another company to collect a high salary, and emerged as a winner once again.
If you have a strong M inclination, this is your best choice.
Asia's largest event platform—awesome!
This is a company that is unfriendly toward women.
As a woman, if you have any of the following characteristics, you may be subjected to verbal or physical harassment. The severity may vary depending on the level of your strengths:
1. Young 2. Good-looking 3. Pleasant 4. Body
If you do not have the characteristics above, congratulations first. Although you may not be harassed after joining this company, you may instead be treated based on your appearance, restricted or made things difficult for by rules, or even ostracized. In short, if you do not meet all four conditions above, proceed with caution. However, people who like the atmosphere of university student clubs should probably enjoy it quite a bit, as there are often activities involving sharing and discussion.
None
Before even scheduling an interview, they notified me that I had to submit three event-planning assignments, which I was willing to accept! After submitting them by the deadline, I heard nothing. There was no response even when I followed up, and two weeks later I saw that the job posting had been closed. This company seems to... be... somewhat disrespectful to job seekers. I spent five nights working overtime after work to complete the assignments—truly an experience~
The colleagues are very easy to get along with and respect everyone’s individuality. Even introverts can be themselves. It’s a flat organization, so there are no bureaucratic issues.
Having previously worked at a large bureaucratic company, I was deeply impressed by the light office-politics atmosphere and how easygoing the colleagues are.
There is no overtime culture. Work starts at 10 a.m., and by 7:30 p.m. there is almost no one left in the office.
The benefits cannot compare with those of large companies with employee welfare committees,
but for young people who value continually changing jobs to improve their abilities,
this does not have much impact.
Compared with startups that have snack bars, the company only has a beverage cabinet and snacks that everyone brings in themselves.
The company is somewhat well-known, and the work feels very passionate.
More than a month after submitting my résumé, I suddenly received a reply asking me to respond within seven days, provide an annual marketing plan, write a long-form article capable of being widely shared, and plan a complete paid event. The final paragraph said, “After receiving your response, we will decide whether to invite you to a further interview.”
It feels like they only reached out to applicants because they were short on ideas, to see whether they could pick up someone suitable. Requiring an annual plan before even starting the job is rather bizarre. After completing all three tasks, there still might not even be an opportunity for an interview—isn’t that essentially getting a free proposal? It’s even more convenient than soliciting submissions...
None
Before getting an interview notification, you first have to answer three pointless questions. You don’t even have to think to know the answer: How do you attract talent? Of course, with money—what, are we doing charity work???
Interview: Product Designer (UI/UX Designer)
The interviewer was quite candid and did not gloss over the drawbacks of the job. At the beginning of the interview, they proactively introduced the job responsibilities before asking me to introduce myself. Applicants who are not selected are notified by email.
1. Before the interview, I was asked to complete a small assignment: propose UX improvements for the event通 website/app. It felt somewhat like this interview was being used as a meeting to collect optimization suggestions.
2. The interviewer has been the company’s only PM in recent years. There were previously two UI/UX designers, both of whom worked in coordination with this person, so if there are any poorly conceived designs on event通, they can usually be traced back to this individual.
3. Based on the interviewer’s description of the role, it sounds like the UI portion accounts for more than 80%, with few opportunities to conduct UX validation.
4. When discussing poorly designed areas on event通, the PM usually brushes them off with reasons such as “we were in a hurry at the time” or “we didn’t think it was important.” Under the leadership of the same PM, there is no guarantee that future designs will not continue to be heavily compromised under these supposedly “unavoidable” circumstances.
5. The interviewer places a strong emphasis on candidates’ aesthetic sense, so this job should actually be called UI Designer. However, designing a UI that looks better than the existing event通 apparently does not require the skill level of a Dribbble guru....
6. The office environment is old and somewhat unattractive.