The posts below are doing such a terrible job of whitewashing things.
HR, could you please do better?
The division of responsibilities within the organization is bizarre—it is unequivocally a company run by personal whims.
Things can be turned upside down over a single person's remark.
Year-end banquet? Not only is it not held every year, it is also held under the name of an annual meeting, and only those at director level or above can attend.
As for the spring banquet, there's no need to mention it—of course, there isn't one.
Just look at Wang Steak next door, will you?
There were three people interviewing that day, including me. At the beginning, when introducing the job, the on-site supervisor came across as friendly and not very stressful. Whenever we had questions, they answered politely. They were also never impatient or unwilling to explain just because we were older, and during the interview they always explained things in a way that helped us understand as much as possible.
None
The headquarters has a pretty good working environment, with a snack area and a beverage cabinet. The department manager and colleagues are also quite easy to get along with. Although procurement involves a fair amount of miscellaneous tasks, everyone is willing to help one another when issues arise, so the work is quite pleasant overall. There are also occasional department dinners, and the colleagues have a great relationship with one another.
The pace is slightly fast, so you need to manage the work rhythm well.
After joining瓦城, I was initially worried that it would be difficult to adapt, but my colleagues and supervisors at the restaurant were all very enthusiastic in assisting and taking care of me, which helped me adapt to the work environment more quickly. As I became more proficient at my work, I also didn’t need to worry about being stuck here, since the company has a performance evaluation and promotion system. This makes me feel that I can develop a long-term career here.
None
The phone invitation for the interview was very friendly, and they even asked about my place of residence so they could arrange an interview at a nearby store. The on-site manager was also very nice on the day of the interview～They asked me to introduce myself first and talk about my personal qualities. The manager also gave a very detailed introduction to the job duties and work environment. Since students have less availability for part-time work, the manager was also very accommodating and allowed me to schedule flexible shifts on holidays.
None
The interview was arranged directly at the restaurant. The supervisor was quite friendly during the interview and explained the job responsibilities in great detail. However, it felt like everyone at the restaurant was quite busy. The supervisor also mentioned that it would be busier and more tiring during mealtimes, but that you get the hang of it once you become accustomed to the work. After hearing that, I felt more reassured. I am currently waiting for the interview results.
It feels like a lot of emphasis is placed on following the service procedures, which may create a fear of not being able to do the job well.
My colleagues are all easy to get along with. When I first joined the company, they were very patient in teaching me, which made working here enjoyable. They never complain that I learn slowly because of the age difference; they are willing to teach me patiently. However, I also need to work hard to learn.
So far, I haven't found anything bad.
The interview started on time, so I didn’t have to wait long. The interview process was friendly, the environment was clean and tidy, they didn’t ask too many personal questions, and they listened attentively to what I had to share.
None
The colleagues are all young, lively, and lovely, and the work atmosphere is great.
Some supervisors have pretty bad tempers, so the atmosphere in the store really depends on the supervisor’s mood.
None
I received a proactive call from an HR representative whose name started with E inviting me to an interview. They were impatient and their answers were completely unrelated to my questions. After the interview, they even proactively informed my current employer that I had attended an interview and fabricated the content of our conversation, causing me tremendous trouble. It seems this is simply the level of HR at this company. Those currently employed should be especially careful when interviewing with them. Heh.
A different employee meal every day
The pay is very low. Among the entry-level back-of-house staff, whoever gets stuck handling the cooking and frying gets worked to death.
Management is a complete mess, and the employees at the bottom bully one another.
Every day we have meetings, but no one knows what the hell they are even about.
They spout a bunch of nonsense, with the overall line being that “we are a family.”
A family is best at exploiting its own family members. What a joke 😆
There is never enough staff, so one person has to do the work of two.
A great place for veterans to bully newcomers. Also, this company has a lot of middle-aged deadbeats who like to cause trouble. Don’t waste too much of your youth here.
None
Disorganized system
People thinking of joining
Read this all the way through before you decide
Those sycophants can stop sucking up
瓦城 hit by another wage cut scandal
Employees angrily criticize it: Those who disagree have to resign
https://tw.appledaily.com/....../BHYRQ4IPPU6CIDGHJUN6PTEIPI/
1. The NT$30,000 salary stated in the employment contract upon joining already includes 31 hours of overtime pay; you have no choice but to work the overtime and receive the pay.
2. If the overtime pay is actually deducted (as stated in the article: 30,000 - 4,414 = 25,590), the salary for working at 瓦城 is originally less than NT$26,000 (as stated in the article: NT$24,000 remaining after labor and health insurance deductions). Can they recruit people by directly offering this kind of salary?! Of course—they use the NT$30,000 figure to get people into the company~
3. If employees take unpaid leave, they can still receive NT$23,800 under government regulations. During unpaid leave, employees can also participate in the government's “Recharge and Restart Program,” receiving NT$158 per hour of training for up to 120 hours. Otherwise, they can participate in the government's “安心就業計畫” and use wage-difference subsidies. But what does 瓦城 do? Nothing! It simply says there are no shifts available for overtime, so no overtime pay will be issued~ Yet, I won't let anyone go either; those who can't stand the low wages can leave on their own, okay~
4. 瓦城's cash dividends were NT$12.6 in 2017, NT$13.6 in 2018, and NT$10 in 2019. When business is bad, they can let employees take the losses, but of course not the shareholders. General Manager Charles Hsu Cheng-i and his wife, 瓦城 Brand Director Wu Tan-feng, together hold 50.81% of the shares. The boss has the largest stake, and he is also the largest shareholder.
People thinking of joining
Read this all the way through before you decide
Those sycophants can stop sucking up
瓦城 hit by another wage cut scandal
Employees angrily criticize it: Those who disagree have to resign
https://tw.appledaily.com/....../BHYRQ4IPPU6CIDGHJUN6PTEIPI/
1. The NT$30,000 salary stated in the employment contract upon joining already includes 31 hours of overtime pay; you have no choice but to work the overtime and receive the pay.
2. If the overtime pay is actually deducted (as stated in the article: 30,000 - 4,414 = 25,590), the salary for working at 瓦城 is originally less than NT$26,000 (as stated in the article: NT$24,000 remaining after labor and health insurance deductions). Can they recruit people by directly offering this kind of salary?! Of course—they use the NT$30,000 figure to get people into the company~
3. If employees take unpaid leave, they can still receive NT$23,800 under government regulations. During unpaid leave, employees can also participate in the government's “Recharge and Restart Program,” receiving NT$158 per hour of training for up to 120 hours. Otherwise, they can participate in the government's “安心就業計畫” and use wage-difference subsidies. But what does 瓦城 do? Nothing! It simply says there are no shifts available for overtime, so no overtime pay will be issued~ Yet, I won't let anyone go either; those who can't stand the low wages can leave on their own, okay~
4. 瓦城's cash dividends were NT$12.6 in 2017, NT$13.6 in 2018, and NT$10 in 2019. When business is bad, they can let employees take the losses, but of course not the shareholders. General Manager Charles Hsu Cheng-i and his wife, 瓦城 Brand Director Wu Tan-feng, together hold 50.81% of the shares. The boss has the largest stake, and he is also the largest shareholder.
“Another scandal” means this isn’t the first time!!
The worst group I’ve ever worked for
A company stuck in its ways, where everyone goes to coast until retirement.
Meetings are nothing but a waste of time—just as you’d expect from the pace of a traditional industry! Everyone loves to talk nonsense; you don’t need to do any work, just spend all day talking.
There is no system or structure whatsoever, and the head of the company is a very unintelligent person!
1. The interviewer was friendly and willing to share their experience
2. The interview was not stressful
3. The interview results were communicated very quickly
4. The interviewer placed great importance on the applicant’s answers
5. The head office was very easy to find
I hope they can provide the reason for not hiring me
The interviewer shared many life experiences and things to pay attention to during interviews. Even if they did not intend to hire me, they were still open-handed in offering their experience and assistance.
The notification process was very fast, so I was not left waiting.
None yet