Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesAfter thinking about it for a long time, I could only come up with one advantage: convenient transportation, being close to Zhongli Railway Station.
1. The base salary is low, and it is also very difficult to earn business commissions—not to mention other assistants or those who do not have to go out and therefore do not receive business commissions.
2. What I find very strange is that the entire company does not even have someone responsible for handling computer-related issues. There are many problems with the email system, which often causes me to be blamed by clients.
3. The employee turnover rate is very high. When I asked people privately, most said it was because of salary issues.
4. The base salary is already low, yet the perfect-attendance bonus is also deducted, so make sure to clarify this when negotiating your salary.
5. Also, the company’s employees do not work on the same floor. On the floors where the boss is not present, many people slack off, and they also ostracize newcomers.
In accordance with the Labor Standards Act
Making empty promises, taking the blame, changing policies constantly, one-person rule, double standards,
bullying the kind and fearing the strong, two-faced managers—everything listed above applies! Those who want to put their mind and body to the test are welcome to join!
Some managers really do think about their subordinates, and the company pays salaries on time. That’s it.
Simply put, it’s a case of “all show on the outside, rotten within”!
As I explained:
Many matters are decided by one person, and the managers have titles but no real authority. The company often announces something in the morning, changes it the next day, and overturns it the day after that. They make it sound nice by calling it “adaptability,” but in reality, everyone below works themselves to death, customers complain constantly, and the account managers keep getting changed. What exactly are they doing?
As for the customers acquired through hard work, if upper management says with one sentence that they should be transferred to another salesperson, that person gets to enjoy the fruits of someone else’s labor. What is the person who worked hard to acquire the customer supposed to do? The person who takes over the customer’s results sits there smugly, saying how great their performance is. Are they saying that changing the person in charge will produce better results? Does upper management think everyone else is intellectually deficient?
They also keep brainwashing people, saying that the company has excellent prospects and benefits, and that employees will be treated so much better after the company goes public. If it’s so great, why is the staff constantly changing and leaving? Then they blame the managers for not knowing how to lead people.
There are also a whole bunch of meaningless meetings and activities. We can’t even finish our work, yet we still have to deal with pointless, mindless activities and mindless organizers. The meetings never seem to end either, and they just repeat things that have already been explained over and over. They expect you to have three heads and six arms and know the products of countless production lines. Everyone has the same eight-hour workday, but we still often have to work on activity reports at home. Sales staff do not receive overtime pay either.
So don’t ask me whether this place is any good.
Close to the station
Feels like telemarketing; a very traditional office-based company. It provides little detail about subsidies for external activities, and the sales role offers no flexibility whatsoever. As for a company that only wants to cut costs, there is no need to mention the salary and benefits.
1. The interviewer was very patient in explaining the relevant responsibilities and company benefits.
2. The salary increase evaluation system is very appealing.
Overall, there are no particularly notable drawbacks. The only thing I felt was somewhat disrespectful was that they did not carefully review the applicant’s résumé, so they repeatedly asked the same questions. The process was first a phone interview → an on-site interview → a second interview.
At the time, I asked when I could find out the result at the earliest, and they replied that it would be before the following Monday. I waited almost two weeks and received no response. Whether I was rejected or there was some other situation, I think they should have sent an email to inform me.