Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelines• Stable monthly salary payments
• During the interview, it was stated that the year-end bonus would be at least 4 months’ salary
• Comprehensive benefits system
• The actual year-end bonus was only approximately 2 months’ salary, which differed from what was stated during the interview
• The year-end bonus was paid in three installments, which was not disclosed in advance during the interview process
• The manager had poor emotional control and used extreme, personally demeaning language when communicating with colleagues
• Afterward, the manager often used “This is also for your own good” as an excuse, but this had a significant impact on employees’ psychological stress
• The manager privately relayed negative comments about me and other colleagues to each of us, causing unnecessary misunderstandings and pressure among colleagues
None
Extremely high turnover
Coming here is definitely not about praising how great or wonderful this company is.
1. High employee turnover; most people do not stay for long.
2. More than half of the IT department consists of outsourced personnel.
3. The systems are unstable: fixing A breaks B, and fixing B breaks C.
4. Work assignments are extremely strange and completely unrelated to the job description originally provided during recruitment.
5. The company hires engineers but does not assign them programming work.
6. The quality of the full-time employees is extremely poor. Managers do whatever they want and handle matters according to their moods; the entire office area can hear them screaming.
7. Business staff are supposed to find partner stores that can make money for the company, but a small portion of the projects they bring in are operated at a loss.
8. After working in the software industry for more than 10 years, this is the first company I have encountered that performs only normal transaction testing and does not conduct reverse validation testing. (When I asked why, the answer was: “Why do we need to do reverse testing? As long as transactions can be completed, that’s enough.”)
9. Outsourced personnel there are treated like dogs: when you are told to do something, you do it, and you cannot express opinions about better ways to handle it. Otherwise, you will be assigned to the fringes.
10. You can try downloading iCash Pay to verify the points mentioned above and see why an electronic payment service can be so difficult to use!!
You can stay here for a while, but it's not suitable to stay for more than two years. Uni-President is, all things considered, a business with a conscience, but it's also very much a place to coast until retirement. The pay is fairly conventional, but they won't maliciously dock your pay. If you want to add something to your résumé, this place works, but if you're pursuing excellence, reaching the pinnacle, and a better quality of life, this isn't the place. It provides enough to get by, but not enough to thrive.
As mentioned above.
A fixed annual allowance of NT$7,000–11,000 in gift vouchers and a travel subsidy (not exceeding NT$10,000).
To compete with other electronic payment providers, the company has recently started introducing many new businesses, but refuses to invest resources and only uses new hires to handle problems (because they are cheap). Requests are constantly passed down, yet there is no analysis, design, or planning (because there is not enough manpower). Simply put, it is neither suitable for newcomers to gain experience nor for anyone looking for a long-term place to settle.