This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesTerrible to the extreme
I take responsibility for my words and actions; this is a company that ghosted me after the interview.
Please read the article yourself:
https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Soft_Job/M.1605349500.A.49B.html
Line ID: online135
If you are interested in learning more, you can contact me privately.
Convenient location
The office is fairly new
The atmosphere among colleagues feels quite harmonious
When the supervisor first invited me to an interview, they told me that HR would contact me later with the interview details. However, HR still had not contacted me by the day before the interview. After I proactively contacted the supervisor, HR sent me the interview information and résumé for me to fill out.
When I arrived at the company, the supervisor asked whether I had brought my résumé. I explained that HR had not told me I needed to print it out and submit it. I found that a little strange, but I thought, “Never mind.” The interview itself was fairly pleasant. Ten days later, I contacted the supervisor to ask about the interview result because I had other opportunities and wanted to know first whether I had a chance. The supervisor then called to tell me that I had been accepted and that HR would call me on Saturday about reporting to work on October 5 (there was a make-up workday that week). HR did not call, so after waiting another three days, I proactively called the supervisor. She said not to worry because she had already submitted the employment form. When I asked about the salary, she said HR needed a week to complete the salary approval process and would contact me the following week. After thinking it over, I decided to wait longer because this was a company I wanted to join. I then waited another three days, but the next day was a holiday. I called the supervisor again, and two hours after she hung up on me, HR called to say that, because of the annual budget and so on, they would not be hiring me after all.
I feel that if my abilities were not a good fit, it would have been fine to tell me directly. However, the company’s behavior of wasting someone else’s time left a very bad impression. If you are considering interviewing here, please think carefully—you may encounter a problematic supervisor or problematic HR. Being a listed company with capital of 800 million does not mean you will not run into problems, so do not put too much faith in a verbal offer. I have not shared this on any other public platform; I only hope that after reading this, everyone will think it over carefully and learn from my experience that it only counts once you actually receive an offer.
There is water to drink during the interview
The HR department at this company really has issues, and comes across as very unprofessional. Whether it was the interviewers or HR, most of the questions they asked were negative questions (not technical in nature). It made me wonder whether there are some difficult-to-resolve problems internally. The interview questions also suggested that this company has an extremely high turnover rate. What seemed particularly strange was that the interview invitations appeared to be initiated by department managers rather than HR? As for the subsequent interview results, just as people below have commented, they may ghost you (the company's time is precious; the candidate's time is worthless). Even if you ask, they respond with an arrogant attitude, as though they couldn't care less.
Summary:
a. As for how profound the technology at this company is supposed to be, frankly, "not at all."
b. The kind of person this company is looking for is an obedient good kid.
c. If you end up in an unfortunate department, all I can say is that you are extremely unlucky.
d. They want people who look pleasing to them (even if they have little ability, that's fine, as long as they can serve as a headcount) ... This point is extremely important!!!
An interview is actually a two-way process, and both sides must respect each other and interact as equals. But this company seems not to understand that. It gives people the impression that being able to bring you into the company is an act of charity on its part. Unfortunately, it still retains this traditional corporate culture, which has gradually been rejected by people.
Perhaps I just happened to encounter one of the worse departments at this company.
The interviewer seemed fairly professional.
- HR did not respect the candidate’s time, calling late and making them wait for nothing, without seeming to feel embarrassed or apologize.
- After the interview, HR initially said they would respond within a week but completely ignored the candidate. Even when the candidate proactively followed up, there was no response. Then, two or three weeks later, HR said they wanted to make an offer.
- HR was not very good at introducing the company and the role, and gave off an arrogant, take-it-or-leave-it attitude.
- They unilaterally canceled the offer without proactively informing the candidate; the candidate only found out after asking.
Based on the interviewer’s impression, this seems like a very demanding company, and HR’s professionalism and attitude need improvement.
Pay salaries on time
Don't come here to suffer! Life is beautiful.
Every year, a group of people leave after the Lunar New Year~
Many people report the issues to HR,
but HR makes no changes whatsoever
and just keeps busy tricking people into joining. Hehe.
When projects go wrong, everyone shifts the blame onto one another.
Some managers → treat employees as stop-loss points!
If you work here, it's recommended that you record and retain evidence of your managers' instructions, meetings of all sizes,
and even conversations during client visits!
To facilitate the provision of evidence later!!!
Punctual salary payments
Don't come here to suffer! Life is beautiful.
Every year, a bunch of people leave after the Lunar New Year~
Many people report issues to HR,
but HR makes no changes whatsoever,
and just keeps on deceiving people into joining ㄎㄎ
When projects go wrong, everyone shifts the blame onto one another.
Some managers → treat employees as stop-loss points!
If you work here, it's recommended that you record and retain evidence of your manager's instructions, meetings of all sizes,
and even conversations during client visits!
To facilitate the provision of evidence later!!!
Pays salaries on time
Don’t come here to suffer! Life is beautiful.
Every year, a group of people leave after the Lunar New Year~
Many people report issues to HR,
but HR makes no changes or implements any measures,
and just keeps deceiving people into joining. Hehe.
When projects go wrong, everyone shifts the blame onto one another.
Some managers → treat employees as the point of loss control!
If you work here, it is recommended that you record and retain evidence of your manager’s instructions, meetings of all sizes,
and even conversations when visiting clients!
To facilitate providing evidence later!!!
Pays salaries on time
Don't come here to suffer! Life is beautiful.
Every year, a group of people leave after the Lunar New Year~
A bunch of people report the issues to HR,
but HR makes no changes or provides any solutions,
and just keeps busy deceiving people into joining. Hehe.
When projects go wrong, everyone shifts the blame onto one another.
Some supervisors → treat employees as stop-loss points!
If you work here, it is recommended that you record and retain evidence of your supervisors' instructions, meetings of all sizes,
and even conversations when visiting clients!
To facilitate subsequent evidence-gathering!!!
Pays salaries on time
Don’t come here to suffer! Life is beautiful.
Every year, a bunch of people leave after the Lunar New Year~
A lot of people report issues to HR,
but HR makes no changes whatsoever
and just stays busy tricking more people into joining, hehe.
When projects go wrong, everyone shifts the blame.
Some managers → treat employees as scapegoats!
If you work here, I suggest recording and keeping evidence of your manager’s instructions, meetings of all sizes,
and even conversations when visiting clients!
To facilitate presenting evidence later!!!
None. Suitable for slave dogs.
There are too many to write down.
Classic Taiwanese company style.
The company has little future.
They only exploit employees.
High turnover.
Long working hours.
Don't come and waste your time.
Close to an MRT exit, with a convenient location
The office is fairly new
Recently, HR has been hiring mostly inexperienced youngsters
But they all end up going to the client site
Standing around getting lectured
Everyone was punctual and joined on time
The HR representatives and interviewers had very poor communication skills.
They were the ones who proactively invited me to apply for this position, but during the subsequent interview, their explanation of the actual job responsibilities was vague and unclear. They said that the content on 104 was only a general outline and that the details had not yet been finalized internally. During the online interview, at least four people joined one after another without turning on their cameras. It felt a lot like being in a Clubhouse room. At the beginning, they had not mentioned that so many people would be participating, which made me wonder whether they were so idle while working from home that they had logged on just to chat... = = One of the interviewers did have their camera on, but they were fixing their face and hair and tidying their appearance in front of the camera... They looked like they had just woken up. 囧 The people with their cameras off did not introduce themselves, so I did not even know whom I was speaking to at the time. Many of the questions they asked were negative, such as how I would handle making a mistake or whether I had ever encountered someone difficult. Perhaps there really are many problems internally and they need someone with strong stress tolerance, but with questions designed this way, applicants can simply fabricate stories to tell them. If the stories sound inspiring, does that mean they pass? Why not think about how to solve the internal problems instead of finding someone to come in and bear those problems with them? This kind of image is quite a turnoff... Even someone with excellent stress tolerance would not want to face these situations later on. I feel that designing interview questions and managing their tone and emotions in conversation are areas they urgently need to improve.
Overall, I felt that their goal was to fill a vacancy, rather than to be a company that attracts talent to join. Judging from the atmosphere of the interaction, my impression was that the internal turnover is very high. Although I did later receive an offer, I am sorry, but this is not the team I want to join.
None
Terrible company
A certain manager acted arrogantly during the interview
Asked a bunch of irrelevant questions
Extremely disrespectful