None at all!
【They ghosted me for the interview—think twice before applying】
A publicly listed company actually stood me up for an interview, and after searching online, I found that I’m not the only job seeker who has suffered the same treatment.
After the first interview, they told me that I would have a second interview with Director Kuo Li-ching on August 7. However, they stood me up on August 7, causing me to waste a day of annual leave. The integrity of this company is questionable; think twice before applying.
Only after I filed a complaint with the 104 job-search website did the company send an email, casually stating: “We’re sorry that we do not have a position that meets your criteria.” Then why did you invite me to a first interview? They didn’t even offer a word of apology, as if standing someone up for an interview were perfectly normal.
Their lack of integrity and refusal to admit fault are utterly unacceptable! I’m very glad I didn’t join the company!
None
1. On the day of the interview, the supervisor stood me up. If an interview cannot be arranged because the supervisor is unavailable, please say so in advance when the time is being scheduled. Do not wait until the applicant arrives for HR to say that the interviewing supervisor is not there, wasting the applicant’s time and money. As a result, another employee conducted the interview, and they ultimately asked me to schedule another time to interview with the supervisor. When they called again later, I declined to interview with the company. This was very disrespectful to the applicant.
2. The starting salary is not high. There is no allowance for day-shift rotation, and the night-shift allowance is pitifully low. No wonder people are unwilling to go; employee turnover is very high.
3. They require many skills and want to use low pay to find someone who can do everything, yet they are unwilling to pay even a little more.
None
1. The supervisor showed no respect for the interviewee and kept trying to pry into their privacy. Before the interview, applicants were required to submit their resumes in advance, but after emailing them, it turned out that neither HR nor the supervisor had even looked at them. It was completely inefficient.
2. The starting salary was not high, approximately 26–28K.
3. As mentioned above, the job required many skills and seemed to be looking for someone with extensive abilities at a low salary. During the interview, they kept saying they wanted to enter the Japanese market, yet they were unwilling to pay even a little more.
Occasionally required to work overtime on weekdays; overtime pay is available, but there is a possibility of working until midnight.
Before the interview, they sent an email asking me to fill out a form, saying it would make the interview go more smoothly, but in the end they did not look at it at all. They only review it on-site for every interviewee, expect candidates to know a great deal, and then say they cannot afford the salary and can only offer 26–27K. The skills required for the job are inversely proportional to the salary.