群健科技股份有限公司

1. The questions asked by the interviewer during the interview genuinely revealed the candidate’s understanding of the position.

2. The interviewer cared about the candidate’s future plans and took the answers into consideration (after joining, the supervisor provided relevant information).

3. The office environment was comfortable.

4. The interview helped the candidate better understand what the company is working on.

5. The interview lasted about half an hour, which was just right.

1. The interviewer spoke relatively softly XD, so I had to listen carefully or ask them to repeat themselves.

1. A well-known nutrition and weight-loss brand, with a steadily growing company

2. Male founder and CEO

Places importance on data and nutrition-related expertise

3. In 2024, a female HR partner joined

Improved efficiency and value in personnel management

1. A run-down office building with low ceilings

The employee seating area is cramped and small

The consultation rooms are separated into individual cubicles

2. Employees have no smiles on their faces

3. The overall atmosphere gives people a bad impression

It does not present the scale one would expect from a company of 100 employees

I consulted a lawyer about the above. This is simply a sharing of my personal impressions, so there is no problem 😊

At least their attitude during the conversation was fairly good.

Actually, I sensed the problem as soon as I walked in.

I happened to enter at the same time as the interviewer.

At that moment, I didn’t know that he was the person interviewing me.

However, without knowing whether I was a customer or a vendor,

he immediately frowned and asked, “May I ask what you need?”

The contrast with his attitude during the interview was striking.

People who have had more work experience will probably know that

this person was likely emotionally unstable—or otherwise a two-faced person.

Regarding HR:

Regardless of whether they intended to hire you, they did not notify you after the interview.

Moreover, after the interview, they confirmed with you how long it would take to hear back.

Since you gave an answer,

but failed to do what you said,

that only reflects your company’s lack of integrity

and the way it handles things.

Although most companies are like this,

the difference between good and bad companies lies in these small details.

While waiting for the interview, I also briefly observed the work environment.

The overall space was fairly bright,

but everyone in the office had a stern expression, and the atmosphere was tense.

For reference by anyone planning to interview there.

1. No need to clock in or out; a high degree of freedom

2. A boss who dreams big, but speaks with considerable depth

3. Computer subsidy provided (if you leave early, a proportional amount will be deducted; it is recommended that you buy a better computer, as it cannot be returned after resignation)

4. Most working conditions are better than those required by the Labor Standards Act

Disadvantages

The CEO and the Nutrition Department lead the company’s affairs, large and small, resulting in the following problems. The points below are merely suggestions for interviewees:

1. Disrespect for other areas of expertise (marketing and product-related expertise); only the Nutrition Department’s expertise is considered professional.

2. Employees are forced to eat as healthily as nutritionists do, overlooking the fact that psychological stress can also make people unhealthy.

3. A hostile environment for newcomers.

EX. Veteran employees form private groups and discuss what is wrong with newcomers together. If you are interviewing, you should find a way to blend in first in order to establish yourself.

EX. Newcomers are treated without respect; veteran employees humiliating new hires has become commonplace. Some veteran employees have poor emotional management and lack management skills, yet are still managers. Respond cautiously and keep evidence of everything to protect yourself.

5. The main personnel in the Nutrition Department are relatively willful and unreasonable, with somewhat limited abilities. In meetings, they frequently use rhetorical tactics to claim colleagues’ work as their own, while producing very little substantive work. If you need to meet with them, it is recommended that you proactively make your own contributions highly visible.

6. The company “does not respect original creators.” If you join the company and need to design articles or courses, it is recommended that you first sign a contract with the company specifying “joint intellectual property rights”; otherwise, the following situation may occur:

EX. Creator A’s work is taken by Supervisor B for “reference.” Contracts, sales, and course development are promoted externally under Supervisor B’s “personal” name, providing little help to the “company brand.”

After all, you originally created the work for the company, but it ultimately became someone else’s “personal” work to display and sell. As for the ethical awareness and character involved, everyone can judge for themselves.