Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesNone, a typical interview
The job description discussed during the interview was misleading, and you could file a complaint under the Labor Standards Act. Absolutely outrageous—the actual job was completely different from what was described during the interview.
No experience required
Work assignments are given every day
New employees are mentored by experienced staff
There are more dispatched workers than regular employees
Too many people, with lots of gossip
The break room is very dirty and there is also a hierarchy
If your KPI does not meet the supervisor’s standards, it is best to leave on your own
If there is workplace sexual harassment, be sure to inform your supervisor
For those without experience:
The work content is explained every day.
Newcomers are mentored by experienced employees.
There are more dispatched workers than regular employees.
Too many people and too much gossip.
The break room is very dirty, and there is a hierarchy.
If your KPI does not meet the supervisor’s standards, it is best to leave on your own.
If there is workplace sexual harassment, you must inform your supervisor.
There are none—none at all.
First-round, second-round, and third-round interviews took nearly a month, including preparing a presentation and an interview in English. In the end, it all amounted to nothing. Sure enough, it was a lousy position at a lousy company.
It honestly doesn’t sound like there are any advantages.
If complying with the Labor Standards Act counts, then I guess so...?
Compliance with the Labor Standards Act is the bare minimum that should be provided. Why do so many companies nowadays treat compliance with it as a benefit???
Even large companies are like this. Ridiculous.
The interview invitation said 9:00, but when I arrived that day, they said, “Wasn’t it 10:00?” Very unprofessional.
The supervisor also called an on-site junior manager to conduct the interview at the last minute. The senior manager wasn’t there, so it felt very casual and perfunctory.
The interview questions were also very unclear. They said there were no definitive answers, so I don’t know what the point of giving that test was.
As for the salary, they said it would be determined by the Taipei headquarters, but nothing ever came of it.
Overall, it felt like I went there just so they could go through the motions and get it over with. I didn’t feel that the company was genuinely looking to recruit anyone.
They even wasted my time and money buying a shirt to wear to the interview.
During the busy season, overtime may be required, possibly until midnight at the latest. Female employees can leave at 10:00 p.m.
All I can say is that the cost-performance ratio is really poor.
None
At the time, I applied for a position in human resources. When I arrived, the HR department manager said, “But I don’t have any openings in HR right now.” She then spent the next 30 minutes talking about a bunch of nonsense. I really don’t understand the point of taking time off for this.
Another week passed, and I received a call from Nippon Express’s HR department inviting me to an interview. I replied, “I already interviewed last week.” The other party even said, “Huh? I don’t have your file here.”
I advise everyone not to be fooled. This company truly has no respect for interviewees.