台灣整合防災工程技術顧問有限公司

Can't think of any at the moment

Before joining the company

I saw many comments above saying that the company was known for being frugal.

I still didn't believe it and thought it probably wasn't that bad.

But once I joined, I understood.

It turns out that being frugal means "saving" money from employees.

The company is very good at "protecting" itself,

so I advise everyone to be very good at protecting yourselves too.

When you first join, if you find the employee handbook or other related contracts strange,

don't sign them.

It would be better to resign directly.

Employee trips are basically all abroad.

This company likes to “save money” on certain small things.

I can only say that the company organizes dinners and employee trips so reluctantly that it would be better not to organize them at all.

Employee trips:

1. You have to take your own leave to go. New employees do not have annual leave, so they can only reluctantly take personal leave.

2. You have to pay for it yourself. (You can also choose to contribute a little to a company fund each month, which lets you pay less at the time. However, if you end up not going, the money can only be treated as money thrown down the drain.)

Personally, I don’t consider this a benefit. You would probably be happier taking time off and traveling on your own.

Salary adjustments:

At first, I was very happy that salaries could be adjusted. Even if the increase was small, I could accept that.

However, the salary base was not increased; instead, the “bonus” was adjusted.

The irony is, just look at how much money the company makes.

It still has to take advantage of employees’ meager wages.

Now, about the department I worked in:

Although the department had fewer than five people, somehow everyone could still be two-faced.

The manager had an inflated opinion of himself, and working with him gave you absolutely no sense of accomplishment.

Sometimes, all phone calls, reports, and various tasks would even be treated as though they were worthless.

It felt as if employees had no value in his eyes.

His management ability deserves a big question mark. The people under him were truly suffering.

In conclusion, I personally believe the salary was not high enough to compensate for the mental toll.

None

A company with little structure

Rules change constantly

Everything depends on the department manager’s mood

The office is located in an old residential area, and the working environment is poor

A responsibility-based system with no overtime pay

No opportunities for development, and it is not possible to accumulate experience

The interviewer’s description was entirely compliant with the Labor Standards Act. The company does not require overtime, and the work environment is relaxed, with no strict management system.

They asked about my salary at my previous job. Since the Labor Standards Act prohibits asking about previous-job salaries, I did not answer; they estimated my previous salary on the spot.

The company is located in a residential building, and the environment felt somewhat cramped. The receptionist did not seem to be in a particularly good mood.

The company is listed in the “Search System for Businesses (Employers) Violating Labor Laws and Regulations.”

None

Specializes in government contracts and underbids companies with low prices