Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesThe interviewers were kind and approachable. There were two of them, and the interview lasted about 30 minutes. They treated the interviewee with respect. After the self-introduction, they asked relevant questions (such as professional skills and past experience), followed by an opportunity for me to ask questions and receive answers.
Those interested in website design and social media marketing may want to give this company a try. Preparing relevant knowledge in advance can increase your chances of being hired.
Before the interview, it is recommended that you first familiarize yourself with the website this company created for its job-search website. During the interview, they will ask for your opinions about it (such as its pros and cons). If you know nothing about it, the situation may feel somewhat awkward. (I had looked through it beforehand, but I was still nervous when answering. Fortunately, I received positive feedback from the interviewers.)
The company benefits are good, and the business focus is straightforward, mainly centered on government projects. There is a promotion system, and after the three-month probationary period, salaries are adjusted on average once a year.
There are benefits such as project bonuses, health checkups, and welfare funds. After completing one year, employees are eligible for travel subsidies, education and training subsidies, and other benefits.
It is worth mentioning that the chairs at this company are Herman Miller Aeron 2.0 chairs, which is a considerable benefit for people who work long hours.
The company operates under a responsibility-based work system, so overtime sometimes occurs. Personally, I consider it to be within an acceptable range.
The environment seems pretty good, although I didn't look too closely.
They promised to provide an update, but are actually big users of the silent rejection card. Other senior colleagues have had the same experience: they promised during the interview, or explicitly stated on 104 that they would notify applicants again, but it all ended in silent rejection.
I can actually accept receiving no notification, but when there is a specific promise, this feels like a bit of a deduction.