Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesIn a fairly upscale office building, with a Mercedes-Benz showroom on the first floor.
The building has a large central atrium, but it feels like very few companies have moved in.
Because the atrium is so large, the companies' office areas are relatively small.
On the same floor as Cathay Pacific, but the office seemed to be constantly under renovation.
The employees' office is the innermost room.
The interview took place in a mini meeting room in front of the reception desk.
There was a standard application form to fill out, including employment dates by month and salary.
The interview felt more like a conversation. After a brief self-introduction, they asked questions based on the résumé.
The interview lasted about half an hour, and compensation and benefits were not mentioned at all.
The atmosphere in the office and at the reception desk felt rather indifferent, with everyone focused on their own work.
According to news reports, it seems that the partners parted ways in early 2025 because of differences in their philosophies.
Several veteran managers and employees have left, and there are many openings now.
However, it feels like the company has not improved since the split, and there seems to be a lot going on beneath the surface.
...the building is quite impressive?
You have to fill out their standard form. The lower half of the form seems to be their evaluation criteria, with six categories including “professionalism” and “demeanor.”
After introducing the job responsibilities, they ended the interview without asking anything about my expertise. It was even faster than a phone interview or an in-person interview—about ten minutes.