Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesOffice-based work
Many internal cliques
The boss shows serious favoritism and treats people differently
Significant differences in treatment between departments
The company uses its business registration number for things employees paid for themselves
The boss has a poor attitude and does not respect professional expertise
Plenty of free time that can be used for self-improvement; stable annual raises
The system is chaotic and lacks principles. Leadership preferences are unpredictable; they often say one thing and then contradict themselves, and they also like to make grand promises. Promised things are often not completed.
There are clear boundaries between departments, as well as cliques and instances of targeting specific groups.
The work is complicated and often involves handling things outside one’s professional field.
There is a low level of trust between supervisors and employees. Rumors are frequently believed without actual verification.
You can spend the entire day handling company affairs without worrying about the rain.
They are relatively good at painting grand visions for you. Also, an incompetent general can exhaust the entire army: you will often work overtime, but the likelihood of receiving overtime pay is extremely low—possibly none at all (I have heard that someone reported them for violating the Labor Standards Act). Newcomers considering coming here to learn are advised to think twice. The likelihood of getting a salary increase after three months is also extremely low, because they may say that your abilities still need more refinement. As for wanting other benefits, I suggest not getting your hopes up.