就業情報資訊股份有限公司

None

They were hiring an editor. The interviewer spent an hour talking with a very fake smile. The salary was listed on the job bank as up to 40,000, but in reality it was around 35,000 or less.

They habitually said that our chairman had been very busy lately, flying back and forth overseas, and that they would contact me if there was a second-round interview—but it would probably take one or two months. (What the heck.)

I eventually stopped paying attention to this company, and the job posting was closed not long afterward.

On the surface, they don’t dare shortchange you on Labor Standards Act protections

Such as annual leave, overtime, sick leave, personal leave, menstrual leave, and taking leave

The location is Hsinchu, and it’s a dispatched position at a government agency

The downside is that there’s basically nothing good about it

Thirteen employees left within three months (there were only 11 people in total)

You’d better not be afraid of being sued, being threatened, or having too much work, etc.

Please carefully assess it yourself

A dispatched position in Hsinchu, at the government agency’s department related to employment and career development.

The interview made it sound very good, with lots of potential for development and very appealing.

In reality, half of the grand promises made during the interview will not come true.

The drawback is that there are no advantages at all.

Too many drawbacks

Too many to list

Absolutely nothing, hahaha

I interviewed at this company a few months ago, and even now I’m still angry when I think about it, so I’m writing this in the hope that everyone will avoid it. The interviewer was arrogant and aggressive. If they thought there was anything wrong with you, they would insult you directly, completely disregarding the fact that it was a group interview. It was really frightening. The contact person was the same, which makes you wonder whether everyone at the entire company is like this. They also didn’t ask clearly about information related to me; instead, they waited until after the interview ended to call and continue asking questions, effectively extending the interview time. Finally, they gave people no time to consider the offer: if you were accepted, you were expected to go, and if you declined afterward, you would be harshly berated. Even declining in advance made no difference—you had to reject it on the spot if you didn’t want to go! Incidentally, they didn’t provide any final response deadline at all, and even said that, if accepted, they might not notify you until the day before you were due to start work. It was completely unequal between employer and employee. They seemed to think that paying money to hire people made them incredibly important. For a company with this kind of attitude, I strongly recommend not going.

The company is located in a building, and the interviewer was friendly.

To be frank, the part-time work is quite miscellaneous. Since it is a temporary agency position, the benefits are average, and you may need to provide support at exhibitions.

It is suitable for working while studying, but if you are considering a full-time position, think carefully. The office environment is small, it is a responsibility-based system, and the compensation is not very good.

The benefits and compensation are acceptable.

1. Temporary agency assignments are mainly in the public sector. Some people in the public sector treat temporary agency workers very poorly. Since you are not a civil servant, they will ask you to handle many tasks, and reporting the issue to Employment Information Co., Ltd. will not provide much practical help.