Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesNone
Repeatedly asked about the candidate’s partner’s work and both parties’ privacy.
Disrespected the candidate’s expected salary (expected range = job posting range), questioning whether they understood the salary level for this position in this region.
HR asked whether the candidate could travel to XXX in Vietnam (not mentioned in the job description), and stated that this would be an important criterion in deciding whether to hire them. However, when asked about travel-related benefits and arrangements, HR was vague.
During the interview, the supervisor said that travel would not be required; the two interviewers gave inconsistent answers.
During the subsequent interview, the hiring manager had a hostile attitude and completely disregarded recruitment etiquette.
Applied for an R&D assistant position. The hiring manager has rather old-fashioned ideas, so if you have an extremely strong sense of responsibility and are willing to work under an “all-inclusive responsibility” system, you will get along well with him. A monthly lunch allowance of 2,400 is included in the full salary, and the perfect-attendance bonus of 1,000 is also included in the full salary.
Their hiring philosophy is still far too conservative. They keep saying that young people leave whenever they feel like it and that failing to properly complete a handover is irresponsible... I think people should treat each other mutually; we really cannot be so heartless. I do not know how he manages people or what has caused the current situation of talented employees leaving in a hurry, but I do not want to be treated this way. Besides, I have ability and ambition, and I want good pay and benefits. They can only afford monkeys that eat bananas... Everyone understands what I mean, right?