Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesNone
Poor benefits, the company provides no training, and managers disparage their own employees behind their backs
1. Colleagues at the branch are easy to get along with; that's the only reason I stayed.
2. The benefits are all there. As for the year-end bonus, just don't compare it with those of other companies in the industry—the more you compare, the more depressing it gets.
3. At the branch where I work, as long as you deliver results, your supervisor won't micromanage you, so your schedule is somewhat flexible.
4. You can develop strong skills in handling customer situations and communication (because the company's conditions will drive you crazy).
1. If you compared the company to a person, it would be a middle-aged or elderly person seeking stability! Its product terms are always one step behind the market, and its market visibility is low. You'd never guess it's Taiwan's first property insurance company. ^^
2. Internal communication is inefficient. Sales, underwriting, and claims each do their own thing; don't expect too much mutual assistance.
3. Underwriting information is outdated. I always learn about government-promoted laws and regulations from other companies first. In addition, the non-auto insurance division is slow to provide quotes, so you need immense patience and strong customer-handling skills.
4. The company bought a new building in Taipei and keeps bragging about it every so often—how annoying! The office environments at the other branches are terrible (cramped spaces and dim lighting). Why not improve those first? Also, replacing all the chairs across Taiwan was ridiculous = = Do they think sales staff sit all day? They could at least replace the monitors. The company's monitors are probably products from 10 years ago; staring at such small screens for long periods is making my eyes go blind!!!!
5. I feel that supervisors are hostile toward colleagues who leave for competitors. Please~~~ reflect on your own company first!!!!
6. Claims depend on who you are; fend for yourself.
7. One last point: if the chairman isn't replaced, this company will stay like this—just look at how many general managers it has gone through in three years. ^^
The supervisors and colleagues are generally easy to get along with.
There is no overtime pay, and the salary and benefits are not very good. Salaries are adjusted every year, but the increases are ridiculously small; however, the year-end bonus is fairly decent. The IT equipment is outdated, and the company is unwilling to invest the time and money in training employees, resulting in a significant staffing gap. Most people take their work very seriously, but lack logic and principles. Internal communication is problematic, which often leads to wasting time on meaningless tasks.
None
A company that pays you extremely low wages. The year-end bonus is one month of base salary, and performance evaluations depend on the supervisor's preferences. No overtime pay. Upper management only likes to hear good things. After the 25th, you cannot request annual leave. The benefits are also poor. Strongly not recommended.