Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesUnknown
This company is very strange. They found my résumé through 104, yet privately emailed me with an invitation, saying it was because they receive many résumés that do not meet their requirements. This reason did not convince me; instead, I felt it was a major drawback. Then, when I asked about the salary range, they said it would be discussed after the interview. I checked the sender and found that they were still an employee in the same position, which indicates that this company does not even have HR. How good can a company be if it cannot even provide a basic salary range?
Can't think of any
1. During the online interview, I was asked about private matters such as rent and living expenses, which made the interviewer seem highly unprofessional.
2. The second interview was arranged proactively, but I was only informed that it had been canceled on the day of the interview. During the first interview, I was told that they might not be able to provide the result immediately, but the reason given for the cancellation was that they had already found someone.
3. During the interview, the interviewer described the applicant's previous work as “not strenuous at all.” Apparently, because all jobs were found with a specific purpose in mind, the interviewer seems to believe that one must be completely free of desires to consider work strenuous.
4. The email before the interview told the applicant to send electronic files of a portfolio, work experience, and so on in advance, and to prepare a paper copy for the interview. However, during the interview, it felt as though the interviewer had not reviewed anything beforehand and only looked at the résumé printed from 104. If that was the case, why waste the applicant's time preparing things that would not be looked at, and make the applicant waste money and paper photocopying them?
5. There is no overtime pay, and overtime is frequently required.
6. There is no professional HR staff; the interviewer might even be from general affairs.
7. The interviewer had a poor attitude and seemed rather conceited.
The interviewer was nice.
An annual bonus is not guaranteed, and the working hours are long with no overtime pay.
The boss is thoughtful
The overtime hours are too long