This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesThere are a few hundred dollars in monthly meal allowances, but the salary is low, and the meal allowance can only be used to buy Starbucks cakes and drinks.
The administrative assistant position was a terrible job eight years ago; people in the role historically stayed for less than three months on average. Lunch boxes had to be delivered one by one to other people’s desks, as if the coworkers were paralyzed. Inventory-taking was done by only one person and was subject to deadlines. Coworkers liked changing seats and would get upset about the item-transfer forms beforehand—truly ridiculous. The coworkers were difficult and liked to ostracize people. If you want to toughen your mind, you can give it a try.
Good company culture with lots of room for development.
Colleagues and supervisors are also very easy to get along with.
During the interview with the supervisor, they were very friendly and explained the job responsibilities and expectations. Then Mr. I from Human Resources joined the interview and kept talking about the company's shortcomings, giving the impression that he wanted to dismiss me quickly. The interview process was very uncomfortable. For example, I said: “I think the colleagues, supervisors, and atmosphere at First Group are great, the systems are very well established, and the company has a lot of potential for development.” (Because of various circumstances, I often have opportunities to interact with First Group.) Mr. I replied: “Actually, Mo Di currently doesn't really have much of a system either. If you come here, you will also feel that it is a company without systems,” and so on.
After the interview, I still kept wondering: if you did not want me to join your company, why invite me to an interview? I was filled with doubts. I also feel disappointed that a company I had always thought highly of has an HR employee like this.
The company is becoming younger.
Maternity leave benefits: employees with newborns receive additional leave each month.
Productivity unit; there are relatively more opportunities for business travel.
The salary is much lower than that of competitors.
The company is cost-conscious, annual raises are small, and there are unreasonable restrictions on expense reimbursement applications.
Overtime is mostly unpaid; responsibility-based system.
The company is relatively young.
Who you know at work matters more than what you do.