Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesLoose organization
Treats employees like volunteers, owes employees several months of wages, and continues taking on outside projects
The organization and processes are very loose, and there is a snack cabinet.
Unpaid wages have been reported. Below is the response from the Labor Department.
Screenshot:
https://imgur.com/ClxgWQr
Text:
Regarding your report that “伈創股份有限公司” failed to pay workers’ wages for September 2018 in accordance with regulations, the Labor Department responds as follows: Our investigation found that the aforementioned business indeed failed to pay wages for September 2018 in accordance with regulations, constituting a violation of Paragraph 2, Article 22 of the Labor Standards Act. Regarding the aforementioned violation, the Department will request that the business submit its statement in accordance with the law, after which it will proceed with the review of the administrative sanction.
Thank you for your concern and advice regarding municipal affairs. If you have any questions about this response, please contact the case officer directly: OOO, telephone: OOOOOOOOOOO. We wish you
health and happiness.
Taipei City Government Department of Labor敬復
Efficient
The interview attitude was very poor,The interview attitude was very poor,The interview attitude was very poor
A few years ago, I interviewed for a .NET Engineer position.
Before the interview, I saw comments about the company on a salary information website stating that its employee turnover was high and that it would dismiss people once they were no longer considered useful.
Based on my understanding of the position during the interview, I judged that there was a strong possibility that people would be dismissed once they were no longer considered useful.
However, this is purely my personal speculation. I did not join the company, so I cannot verify whether the facts were actually as I inferred.
I feel that it is inappropriate for someone who did not join the company to leave a poor review based on speculation, so I left an average review.