This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelines1. There are some good people
2. Close to the MRT
3. No relevant experience required, suitable for beginners interested in the industry
1. Business performance is poor, with no bonuses or year-end bonus
2. Game development is very slow
3. Back-office departments such as accounting interfere with and audit the work of every department
4. Professionals are not respected; programmers direct the artists’ work
5. Equal work, unequal pay
No
。The CEO is not CEO material, lacks management ability, and is poor at judging people.
。Each manager has their own hidden agenda, only tending to their own patch, and only wanting to satisfy their personal desires and achievements.
。The company does not feel like a company and has little sense of cohesion.
。The management team is generally immature, yet these people are still the group that has stayed with the company the longest. Based on this, the company probably has little chance of continuing to grow.
。Suitable for people with insufficient experience to accumulate experience or hone their skills; more senior people or those with brains would not want to stay long.
。It is a company where “everyone is still learning.”
。The company is quite noisy. There is one finance person who is especially prone to hysterics, which is a little frightening.
。There are several dickbrain engineers who particularly like groping female colleagues.
。There is a small group of extremely emotional client team members
1. No one manages the company, and there aren't many rules or procedures.
2. They recruited many beautiful girls to motivate the dampness.
3. They advocate WaterScrumfall.
4. You can learn many political tactics.
5. The front-end leader is very responsible and handles all the core technical work personally, so no one else ever gets a chance to touch it.
6. The company has no small cliques, only one big clique. Anyone who isn't part of the group has been asked to leave.
7. There is a great Data Team. Its data analysis is extremely unique, giving everyone plenty to do and making them very blind.
8. The business strategy is very strong. The company's performance is poor every year, but it never goes under.
9. The company really values talent, but is too kindhearted: it takes in what others don't want and gives the good people to someone else.
10. It places tremendous importance on every employee's opinion; professionalism here is for reference only. The person in charge of finance can interfere with decisions made by other professional departments, and front-end developers can meddle with game design and back-end mechanisms.
There are too many advantages to list them all in a short time.
How could such a great company possibly have any drawbacks?
Although my time with the company was short, I ultimately left due to some family-related factors (the probability game development industry).
However, the company’s overall image and culture, as well as its American-style management, left me with a very good impression.
The office is beautiful, and the managers and experienced employees are also very willing to help newcomers integrate into the environment. It completely lacked the feeling of cliques.
It was not nearly as frightening as the online reviews made it sound (at least that was the case for the team I was on).
If circumstances permit in the future, I hope to have the opportunity to work together again.
None
Pros
- The HR staff are very attractive, and the reception staff are very polite.
- The company environment is beautiful.
- Agile project process including training
- The position is not clearly defined.
- (Personal impression, which may not necessarily reflect the facts) The supervisor values an outgoing personality more than professional ability.
There are some kind colleagues
The office is nice
A good place to retire
Performance is continually declining
There is no internal cooperation
There are hardly any benefits
Sharing my interview experience
The work environment is nice—bright and clean. From the transparent meeting room, I could see that everyone was working in a pleasant atmosphere, interacting and chatting with one another. The manager was not the type to grill candidates during interviews, but was very courteous and focused on discussing technical matters. HR also explained the benefits and policies in great detail (the leave allowance is more generous than required by the Labor Standards Act).
Some online reviews are a bit scary, but I couldn’t sense that from my own experience.
The colleagues are quite easy to get along with, and the atmosphere is good. There are foreigners in the company, and we often collaborate with overseas offices, so it’s quite suitable for people who like an English-speaking work environment. The office was relocated not long ago, so it’s very new.
None
None
The benefits and conditions listed on the job site are vastly different from the company’s actual benefits and conditions.
Even employees who are about to leave are still asked to do all sorts of things on their last day.
None
Does not respect professionalism
Does not value employees
Cliques are a serious issue
Salaries are only paid in the afternoon
There are many rumors
High employee turnover
The above is subjective; if you don't care about these things, it won't matter, but personally, I care a lot!
None
Disrespectful of professional expertise
Pretends to be a foreign company but actually has traditional-industry thinking
You don't need the boss to exploit you; a certain colleague will automatically help the boss exploit other colleagues.
A frightening clique is abusing its power and spreading rumors.