Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesThe interviewer was polite and friendly, and quite easy to talk to.
According to the manager, the Taipei office mainly has an accounting department. The design department currently has only one person, so it is very small.
* Colleagues are easy to get along with. There are many female employees.
* Overtime can be exchanged for compensatory leave. Leave is easy to apply for.
* Transportation expenses for business trips are easy to claim.
* The company has sufficient parking spaces.
* The junior owner is kind and even-tempered.
* The company has experience handling major government projects.
* The company's tourist factory is large and impressive.
* The company has good political and business connections and many project sources.
* The company wants to go public and be listed on an OTC market.
* There are too few male colleagues; the gender balance is off.
* The senior owner makes verbal comments about female colleagues' appearance and figures.
* There is no overtime pay system, only compensatory leave.
* The first half-hour of overtime does not count. (Labor law requires a 30-minute break, but employees just want to finish quickly and leave work.)
* The company and its stores are far apart, so employees have to travel around constantly for work.
* The company parking spaces have no rain shelters.
* The junior owner's personality is unusual; advancing work requires extraordinary patience.
* The senior and junior owners often clash, so work arrangements change significantly.
* The company's management style is hasty and it remains in a state of long-term chaos.
* The core value is not wanting to put in much effort while still wanting to make money.
* The company's tourist factory is large, making it exhausting to clean.
* The company monitors employees' email inboxes, creating a high level of distrust.
* No internal systems have been established, so there is almost no transfer of resources or knowledge.
* Labor insurance salaries are underreported, affecting labor insurance and pension benefits.
* Part-time workers are given only labor insurance and no health insurance (unless they strongly insist).
* The parent company is in an industry that is already deep in decline.
* The company has still not gone public or been listed on an OTC market.