Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelines1. The two technical managers (one man and one woman) were very friendly. The interview process was relaxed and pleasant, and they did not shy away from informing me about the company's shortcomings in advance.
2. Tea and water were provided during the interview.
3. The HR representative was very cute.
1. The salary range on 104 was listed as N–2N, but HR offered N–7k, which was simply a waste of the interviewee's time.
2. Despite being in the travel industry, even employee travel is only subsidized by 3,000–5,000 if you purchase the company's products. The other benefits are also very average.
3. The number-summing test was mentally exhausting and time-consuming, and it was not very meaningful.
Colleagues get along well.
If you want bananas, you can only find monkeys.
The employee travel benefits offered by the travel agency are laughable when you describe them.
If you are a management executive, this place is a good fit for you. If you are merely an employee, don't forget that you still have 104 after joining.
The supervisor was quite willing to share information and explained the general working conditions upfront, allowing the job seeker to assess whether they could accept them.
The process was lengthy. First, you had to take a numerical addition test (with a great many questions), which was supposedly intended to measure learning speed. After completing it, there was also an English exam. The company’s application form required a lot of information, including your previous salary and your supervisor’s phone number. This information had to be provided before being hired, so it is worth considering whether you are comfortable with that. Most of the time was spent on these tests and forms; the interview itself was quite efficient.