This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesUnexpectedly
Too reliant on manual labor, with a very poor environment. There are too few people and too much work; after selecting an item from the vending machine, it is often unavailable, and it is restocked only rarely.
Every month, it feels like the workload increases by another level. If you want a raise or a year-end bonus, switching jobs is recommended.
Sometimes employees are asked to sign unreasonable documents.
Punctual working hours
The turnover rate among this company’s senior managers is extremely high—every time one takes office, they introduce a new system, and each one is a nuisance. They let the middle and junior managers underneath them do whatever they want. They do not focus on production technology, concentrating instead on other things. Their R&D capabilities are not very good, and the products they make have low yields. There are many customer complaints, and the products are difficult to handle. Even the company’s own employees are reluctant to buy them. Other companies have been using AOI automated lens inspection for many years, but this company is still doing manual inspections. Production-line supervisors like to use their phones and do their own things during working hours (guess what). When problems are reported, they consider them minor issues (only their own matters are important). Production-line supervisors tend to target people rather than address the issue. The supervisor who was recently promoted is even more outrageous—it makes you wonder whether they are deliberately trying to bring the company down. They are extremely petty and refuse to listen to others’ opinions, making the entire production line chaotic. Their leadership skills were already poor when they were a team leader, and the employee turnover rate on their team was extremely high. Even after being promoted, they have not improved their poor leadership, resulting in soaring turnover across the entire production line. Apparently, all it takes to get promoted is being good at talking to upper management. The company’s salaries are adjusted about once in a blue moon. Recently, the company only adjusted salaries or granted promotions after all its talent had left. New hires are now mostly dispatched workers, and the way they work is strange. The year-end bonus gets smaller every year—this year it was only 0.2 months’ salary. Capable employees have to learn many stations, while those who are less capable only have to learn one. Capable employees are not paid more and may even be paid less. The company’s policies change several times a day, with no principles. That is the peculiar thing about this company.
The interviewer directly humiliates people, including frontline employees of their own company.
The interviewer’s attitude
Institutional differences; frequent labor disputes; a regular at the Labor Bureau.
The company culture is very poor, and the manager also fails to separate public and private matters, making it easy for them to use their position to settle personal scores.