Close to a Kaohsiung MRT exit... that's all I can think of.
It was categorized under casual chat, so I'm sharing it again.
The interviewer was late and seemed to think that a fresh graduate with a master's degree from one of the Big Four universities was not qualified to earn 30K.
They tried to impress me by boasting about the prospects in mainland China, but were unwilling to let people learn, telling the interviewee to go back and research the company's tools before coming back for a second interview.
I was already put off and didn't go to the second interview.
The supervisor (interviewer) did not clearly explain the job responsibilities and offered an unreasonably low salary, which was unacceptable.
I believe that if the job responsibilities are extremely important to the company’s future prospects (for example, helping to grow the business), then the employee should receive a fair salary. The company should not undervalue someone’s strengths and assume that they can only be paid 2xK. Simply saying that there is room for a raise without explaining how raises are determined is insufficient. The company’s current financial difficulties cannot be used as an excuse; employees should not be held responsible for a failed startup.
The company described its ambitious plans for the mainland China market, but even if the company truly succeeds, its employees will still be treated like ordinary employees. If so, what is the point of making those claims?
The interviewer was late and seemed to think that a newly graduated master's degree holder from one of the Big Four universities was not qualified to receive a salary of 30K.
They made misleading claims about how promising the prospects were in mainland China, were unwilling to let people learn, and told the interviewee to go back, research the company's tools, and come back for a second interview.
I was unhappy after the second interview and decided not to go.