Published on (UTC)
This post was submitted by a user and reflects their personal experience or opinion. The publication date is not an employment or interview date.
no
It's not a monthly salary of 100,000, yet applicants are required to provide the names and contact information of their previous supervisors (is this to make things convenient—and conveniently poach them too?)
They also inexplicably collect the personal information of applicants who were not hired and former employees.
They are unhappy when the company and interviewer are investigated in return.
If you're not a transparent slave, or if you don't fit her preconceived notions, you're not hired.
That female interviewer is out of touch with the times and very much lives in a feudal-era world.