Workplace reviews and discussion: 安法診所

Good working environment

Although it has been four years since the previous review, the experience was basically the same.

1. The test results were essentially treated as a formality. (Many companies at least discuss the test conclusions, but not a single word was mentioned here.) After completing the test, I was made to wait another 10–20 minutes, which was a waste of time.

2. The interviewing supervisor had essentially no understanding of the applicant’s résumé. They asked me to repeat all of my experience from the beginning instead of focusing on experience relevant to the position or asking questions about the résumé.

3. They probably did not remember the job responsibilities listed on the recruitment website either. When I asked what “supporting on-site services” meant, they even gave an expression as if I had asked a stupid question, and merely said that, because of my gender, I would not be asked to do that task.

4. As in the previous review, by this point I could already sense the interviewing supervisor’s impatience, yet they mechanically asked whether I had any other questions, as though simply going through the procedure. It would have been better to end the interview directly.

Overall, if the interviewing supervisor would be my supervisor after hiring, working with them would be concerning, to say the least. Even if I were offered the job, I would not want to accept it.