None

At the beginning of the interview, I had trouble finding the entrance. After calling, I went inside.

I arrived at a place that looked like a warehouse. I was taken through piles of goods to the staff cafeteria for the interview.

The lighting was dim, and I could hardly see anyone.

The place was very large, which seemed quite unusual.

First, I had to fill out a standard interview form. However, some sections, such as reasons for leaving previous jobs and reasons for applying, were difficult to explain in just a few words, and the boxes were extremely small, so I had to write a verbal explanation instead.

Also, the format and design of the form were very different from the position I had applied for.

Now for the main point: the supervisor was a somewhat older woman. From the moment she arrived, she had a very unpleasant expression. Her tone was airy and very quiet, which made me feel extremely uncomfortable. I could barely hear her asking me to begin my self-introduction.

Following my usual approach, I played a video as an opening—an overview of my work that was less than a minute long. But I quickly realized that she was not watching it at all and did not seem interested in watching it. Her eyes were fixed on her own computer, and I was completely dumbfounded.

Since the job description on 104 listed a wide range of content-production duties and did not provide any links for reference—and I could not even find anything through my own searches—I directly asked, as is customary in an interview, whether I could see some actual examples of the work required for this position. I hoped that explaining them alongside the examples would make it easier to understand.

But I really could not have imagined that such a reasonable request—one that had never been rejected before—would receive such an impolite response from her.

She said, “You should look it up yourself first. That takes a lot of time,” and so on.

She said that I was supposed to be the one showing her my work.

Please—was this my first interview? Would things I found myself really be faster and clearer than if you simply showed me examples and explained them?

Besides, she had a computer with her. Would it really have taken that much time to turn it around and explain things?

And the most ridiculous part is that I really dislike it when a supervisor sees a candidate’s work for the first time only after arriving at the interview, supposedly to understand it. That is what truly disrespects the interviewee.

Beforehand, I had asked HR to make sure the supervisor reviewed my work first.

HR also replied that she had.

So I asked her directly at the interview: “I asked about this beforehand. Based on the type of work in my portfolio, which projects do you think fit this position? Or is there any case you would like me to introduce in detail?”

At the same time, I used my tablet to list the projects one by one for her to choose from.

When she heard this question, she panicked and began stammering and pretending to be busy. Only then did she start opening files on her own computer to look at them!!!

After one or two minutes of silence, she started bluffing, saying that she had seen the video I had just shared and wanted to ask about a technical detail.

Anyone could tell from your tone that you were making it up on the spot, okay?

I still explained it politely.

Then she launched into a half-hour explanation of the job responsibilities.

It was extremely scattered and illogical, and she did not accompany it with a single video. Isn’t that what truly wastes time?

Anyway, after she finished talking,

I unusually turned her down directly, saying that she did not need to notify me because I was not interested.

Oh, right—the job responsibilities were also unbelievable and involved taking advantage of one person extensively.

There was only one person on the team, yet they were expected to produce content unrelated to their professional expertise.

Only a fool would take the job.