None

Many people are dissatisfied with the way meetings are conducted, and their understanding of the people leading the plans is extremely low.

In reality, when everyone discusses things,

they rarely approach the discussion from a scientific perspective.

Sometimes, someone clearly steps forward to explain things using scientific methods, but many people still refuse to listen.

At one moment they say you are unfamiliar with it; at another, they say you do not understand the environment in which to use it or where to use it. They only believe articles on the internet, and they always use systems with the highest privileges, such as administrators, to perform tasks directly, yet they do not believe the scientific explanations you provide.

Since compelling evidence has already been presented,

why can things still turn into such an argument? Perhaps it is the result of having too much power.