Workplace reviews and discussion: 仁心聯合醫療體系_台中公園仁心堂中醫診所

Treat it as an experience, and tell yourself that at least you found out about the problem before joining the company.

At the beginning, HR asked me to fill out a form. After I finished, they turned on a computer and asked me to take a typing test (it had been raining heavily for several consecutive days, and they had not mentioned this beforehand). My hands were freezing, but I let that go. I applied for an administrative position, and the interview was conducted by Supervisor A. They first asked me to introduce myself, then briefly explained the job duties and working hours (8:30–18:00), with weekends off. They repeatedly emphasized that they were looking for someone detail-oriented and highly loyal, and that I would need to sign a contract. That was not a problem. They also required a confidentiality clause, which was not a problem for me either. To help me get up to speed more quickly and resolve issues when handling computer-related tasks for the position, they said I would first need to intern at a clinic for one week to become familiar with the registration system and procedures. I had no problem with that either. Throughout the 30–40-minute interview, they emphasized “attention to detail, loyalty, confidentiality, and signing a contract,” along with a general introduction to the job duties. Once they had said about all there was to say, they told me there would be a second interview. However, Supervisor B was not there, so after waiting 10 minutes, the second interview was conducted by video. I could only see myself and could not see the interviewer, which felt somewhat disrespectful to the applicant, but I let that go as well. They again asked me to introduce myself. After I finished, they said, “For this position, you would need to intern in an outpatient clinic for one year. Is that acceptable?” I thought I had misheard, but it really was one year. They then asked, “The outpatient clinic requires shift work. Can you do that?” I said I could not, and the interview was ended.

What I find puzzling is that what Supervisor A and Supervisor B said was completely different—the information was entirely inconsistent. So why waste 40 minutes at the beginning explaining something that was fundamentally different? Wouldn't it be better to state clearly from the outset what they were actually looking for? It made me wonder whether this was a case of presenting one position (Position A) but actually offering another (Position B and its duties). As a chain of traditional Chinese medicine clinics, the employees are the company's assets, but I truly did not feel that they showed applicants the attitude they should have. Job hunting is a two-way process: while a company is looking for talent, talent is also looking for a good company.