Published on (UTC)
This post was submitted by a user and reflects their personal experience or opinion. The publication date is not an employment or interview date.
Tell a joke—do you think there could possibly be any?
It’s unbelievably pathetic.
Replace all the arrogant managers who claim to have been in the industry for “over 20 years.”
Cut all performance bonuses and observe the principle of “weathering the difficult times together”—there might still be a chance.
First, regarding the previous post published on 6/11:
Every word is true! To everyone reading this, congratulations! I’ve already helped you avoid this landmine, so just skip it!
The standard is “use bananas to find monkeys”—if you can’t afford to pay, then please don’t waste other people’s time, okay???????
HR only knows how to schedule appointments, and even the first interview is just a department colleague without final decision-making authority coming to “chat” with you.
When salary comes up in the second interview, they start repeating themselves like a broken record. Double standards, triple standards—every kind of unreasonable challenge you can imagine appears.
1. HR is unbelievably inexperienced.
In the second interview, they ask you to spend time preparing a competitive analysis report.
They asked me why I only provided the report as a PDF file???????? Did they expect free source data?
Use your brain, please. Or when you send a contract, do you give other people an editable file?
2. The manager is arrogant and overbearing, constantly interrupting.
Do you know how to spell “respect”???????? Or is the second interview actually your presentation?????????
If you were reporting to the CEO or board of directors today, would you dare to keep interrupting and repeatedly challenging them in this manner? Do you think you’re a legislator?
Then they use an arrogant, supposedly “for your own good” attitude to criticize everything from start to finish. Ridiculous! Then what were all those earlier screening steps for????
I don’t think you even looked at it beforehand!
Or does that mean your subordinates don’t have the ability to screen candidates????
If you’re dissatisfied with someone’s résumé or think they’re unsuitable, why not simply reject them? Or do you also enjoy wasting people’s time?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In all my time at T1 and T2 companies, I’ve never seen anyone like you.
Do you think I’ve never reported to a CEO or an even higher-ranking executive?????
Or should I tell you that I’m actually related to the board of directors?
Then you use some kind of twisted logic to say that I should have stayed for two years at a place where the product life cycle is one year.
“You think you can only learn things after staying for two years”—so moving to a better platform after one year means the turnover is too high????
In my third month, I helped the platform sign an authorized distribution agreement with the original manufacturer, okay! How many people in the industry have signed one?
Or did you fail to read my résumé again?
As for which manufacturer’s authorized distributor it was, go look it up yourself among the top five companies in the Forbes asset rankings.
3. The company is extremely remote, located in an industrial park; the frontage is ugly, and there’s a wastewater treatment plant right next to it.
If you originally worked in a commercial office building, having at least a presentable entrance is something to be proud of.
Here? I thought it was a warehouse by the riverbank.
The freight warehouse is crammed together with everything else, making entering and leaving dangerous.
There are also a bunch of oversized trucks and freight vehicles in the industrial park that don’t follow traffic rules.
Summary:
The people, location, frontage, and danger involved in entering and leaving—
Every aspect is unbelievably pathetic.