All drawbacks. The boss has no direction.

The boss is probably afraid of being replaced by the supervisor.

He goes around saying that the supervisor is no good, when in fact there is nothing wrong with the supervisor. It may look as though he has been given authority, but he is really just the boss’s puppet. If things are not done well, his authority is taken away. No company would operate this way with such a lack of structure.

He always says that employees leave because of the supervisor. In fact, many people discuss this privately. If the boss could truly stop interfering, this supervisor could really succeed. Their management skills and ideas are actually very good.

How can anyone expect a supervisor who has been there for less than a year to have everything sorted out? Acting rashly only makes things worse. First, consider whether the supervisor and the people under them have really been given authority.

People who were there before also used to say privately, “I gave you the whole situation to handle.” But we can see that this was not the case at all. Everything is driven by emotion. When the boss gets emotional, he pressures the supervisor and randomly scolds people; when he calms down, everything is fine. The supervisor’s direction is not the same as their own because the boss keeps influencing them. The supervisor is actually better at management than the boss. If only this boss would stop interfering. Yes, the boss is still the boss, but he treats the supervisor completely like a subordinate. How is that giving the supervisor authority? When dissatisfied, he comes up with all kinds of reasons to make himself feel better, then takes the authority away. A supervisor who works for this kind of boss will only become more incompetent.