TutorABC_麥奇數位股份有限公司
Pros

(1) The company environment is very good (new building, on the green line)

(2) I met great HR staff and was able to discuss career planning

(3) For the vast majority of people, their goal when facing an issue is [ solve it ]

Cons

(1) The interview content was completely inconsistent with my expectations—extremely so.

I applied for a live-streaming program planner position, but the actual responsibilities were: program planning / event planning / photography / video editing / sales

If you also know a bit of special effects and can use Photoshop and AI, that would be even better! It is a completely end-to-end operation.

(2) The manager who interviewed me was not the main manager I would report to, and the main manager’s management style was appalling.

(1) She only shows off in front of senior management; when the manager is absent, she bullies colleagues and treats them like servants: a sycophant.

(2) Her EQ is extremely poor. Whenever things do not go her way, she goes nuclear and turns into a loudspeaker: the landlady-from-hell concept.

(3) She expects you to handle everything, then gives you only a few hours or a day. When you say it cannot be done, she keeps repeating herself.

For example: There are countless video-editing programs, and the one used by the company was different from the one mentioned during the interview. I also explained that I needed time to learn it.

The manager would keep repeating: “I don’t understand. Is it difficult? What exactly is difficult about it?” Going around in circles endlessly.

(4) Many things are not planned in advance, so tasks are assigned whenever she thinks of them: going around in circles.

(5) She thinks she is extremely capable; every mistake is someone else’s fault, and she is never wrong: incredibly self-satisfied.

(6) She is very confrontational. Whenever she argues with another department and that department stops cooperating with her, she pushes her own projects onto other planners to execute, leaving them with all of her projects and causing their workload to become excessive.

I realized something was wrong after joining and decisively decided to leave!

I just want to share this with everyone: if a manager has the following attitudes, please think it over carefully.

(1) Making grand promises: “You can learn a lot here; your life will become this and that.”

If you are a graduate, I would recommend staying—it is perfectly fine. But if you are not, and hope to specialize in a particular field, stop, look, and listen.

(2) A poor attitude: A manager’s attitude determines what you will become in the future. Even if you tell yourself not to become like them, it will still affect you subconsciously.

(3) Shifting responsibility: There is no team spirit; they only take credit and benefits for themselves while dumping all the undesirable work on colleagues. In this situation, do not stay.

(4) Constantly going off track: If a manager has poor logic or insufficient comprehension, discussions can go seriously off track, and many things will be misunderstood because they have not grasped the key points.

(5) Thinking they are superior: They often say things like, “Back when I was at XX station, I did this,” or “I have done such-and-such before.” So what? The point is the present.

Originally, I hoped to contribute to this team, especially since I had met two excellent colleagues.

But the manager’s management style left me speechless. It was not the first time I had encountered this kind of thing.

So I was able to make a very clear decision: say goodbye.

On my second day at work, I worked more than 16 hours. I was absolutely furious.

Unless you are truly short of money, do not abuse your own body (I developed a serious illness after being overworked by my previous employer).

Having a promising company is important, but whether the team can get along is even more important.

After all, Taiwan’s current work environment is not about fighting alone—you need teammates! Not teammates who drag you down.

Reply
1
Agree
6
Disagree
0
Show all 1 replies