Quickly meet all kinds of new colleagues in a short period of time. The turnover rate is extremely high—in a company of more than 20 people, you can count on one hand the number of employees who have stayed for over two years. If you enjoy interacting with strangers, you are very welcome.

If a company needs to hire someone to whitewash its image, doesn’t that just make it even more obvious that something is being hidden? If the company put some effort into treating its employees well, would employees need to come online to warn job seekers? This move completely confirms the company’s upside-down logic. If you put effort into writing a sarcastic post, please also look at what you wrote: “In the online world, anonymous posts come with no immunity. Some are true and some are false, and some are false and some are true—just take it with a grain of salt.”

1. It shows extreme disrespect for employees’ right to privacy. There are surveillance cameras, listening devices, and computer monitoring—nothing is missing. Employees are monitored through their phones at any time, and even discussions about work with colleagues may be scrutinized. Employees’ phones left on their desks may be casually checked for messages, and the boss’s wife would even loudly berate employees for messaging one another, claiming she was afraid that employees were secretly forming cliques.

2. It shows extreme disrespect for professionalism. The boss’s wife, who is in her twenties, is allowed to cause trouble everywhere and offend vendors and the media, even making threats. She seems to think she knows everything. Can a brand PR representative really afford to offend every media outlet and have distributors cancel their partnerships one after another?

According to what a certain post said: “The quality of new colleagues is uneven. As a result, they do not understand the company’s organizational rules well enough, or they easily cause difficulties in cooperation between the new and old teams.” This shows the company’s distrust of its employees: some employees are categorized as having “uneven quality.” So does the company have certain screening criteria for interviewees? Does it not need to put effort into building team cohesion? By directing the problem solely at the quality of its employees, I think we can understand the company’s own “quality.”

To quote again: “Naturally, a boss is no pushover; naturally, employees know to speak cautiously.” This should make it clear that the company is cultivating a slave mentality among its employees, right?

3. The infighting is more entertaining than *Empresses in the Palace*. The boss’s wife exerts all her energy playing both sides: she agrees with proposals in front of employees, but when the boss rejects a proposal, she immediately changes her position and loudly exclaims how employees could have done such a thing, then turns around and continues criticizing them.

She constantly shifts the blame for her own mistakes onto employees and even makes employees pay compensation.

The boss’s wife may overturn everything at the very last second of an event’s execution, saying that if it is not going to be done, then it is not going to be done.

The work is completely going around in circles, and you can enjoy the thrill of starting from scratch at any time.

In the end, whether you believe this or not, you will only understand after you join. I just hope the company will put more effort into treating its own brand and employees well. If it acts properly and conducts itself honestly, naturally there will not be negative reviews.