Quick and efficient at administrative tasks, with very little to learn.

Whenever you point out a problem with the system, it doesn't get put into the queue for handling right away. Instead, there's first a bizarre review process, and senior colleagues may quietly tell you: “You have no idea how rudimentary the system used to be. We still managed to get by like this.”

Please, I didn't join “back then.” If something in the current workflow needs improvement, then improve it. Am I supposed to be like those senior colleagues, blazing a trail through the wilderness to open up new territory? Employees are expected to optimize things quickly, but the system can come up with a hundred different excuses for why it can't be optimized. Hilarious.

Also, there is no overtime pay, no payslips, and labor and health insurance are provided only at the minimum level. There are various issues with how managers lead their teams; previous comments have already mentioned them and can be consulted. Every bit of it is true. Even though the “more problematic manager” mentioned in those comments currently appears not to interfere much with the work, that person's work logic is quite different from that of ordinary people—they are a time bomb. Please think carefully before joining.

(The other, smaller time bomb is a former colleague who holds no managerial position yet, for some reason, believes they are also a manager. They can change their attitude at the drop of a hat, and once, out of fear of making a mistake, insisted that other colleagues help with their work. The two time bombs are friends, so neither has to be lonely—they have each other for the journey.)