Published on (UTC)
This post was submitted by a user and reflects their personal experience or opinion. The publication date is not an employment or interview date.
I can't see any advantages.
I attended an interview four years ago and then again four years later. The interview began with a written test, but its content had not changed at all over those four years, giving me the impression that the recruitment process had no intention of improving. The most recent time I received an interview invitation, the template email from 104 was very well written. However, when I called, no one in the entire company knew that someone had received an interview invitation and was coming for an interview. They even had to ask the interviewee for their name again, which clearly showed that they did not value other people's time at all.
Before going to the interview, I asked the company about the written test content, but they still knew nothing and said that the test questions were prohibited from being disclosed and that only an English written test could be taken. This is absurd. If they have no intention of allowing applicants to prepare, how are they supposed to determine whether a candidate is suitable for the position? If that is the case, then they should not send interview invitations in the first place! An interview is an opportunity for both sides to learn about and evaluate each other, so why recruit using such a backward approach?
After entering the interview, the supervisor immediately started yelling and slamming doors during a meeting!? I recommend not attending interviews at this company. Judging from the way they operate, it makes people feel that the positions have already been predetermined for insiders. If you want to do a good job developing wind power, start by getting the most basic respect for people right! It is truly laughable to have a company like this handle Taiwan's wind power development!!