Currently, no advantages beyond those provided by the Labor Standards Act have been identified.

1. The cleaners and the company are not in an employment relationship; they have signed a contract for services. However, the company still wants to use your information to report wage payments to the tax authorities, which clearly raises suspicions of tax evasion.

2. The cleaners and the company are not in an employment relationship; they have signed a contract for services. However, the company requires them to attend training before they can officially become contractors accepting assignments, and offers a bonus after they complete 10 orders. A contract for services cannot be used to require performance evaluations, supervision, or participation in training.

3. The cleaners and the company are not in an employment relationship; they have signed a contract for services. However, the company forces workers to use tools specified by the company and requires a deposit of NT$3,000. It also mentions deducting money from monthly wages, which violates the requirement of full payment of wages under the Labor Standards Act (Article 22).

The contract also does not guarantee that the employee’s deposit will be returned within one year (Labor Standards Act, Article 26). It only states that the deposit can be reclaimed when there is no work assignment, meaning that the deposit can only be recovered upon resignation. Tools and uniforms are labor costs or employee benefits, and the costs should not be borne by the workers.