Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesNo advantages
Before the interview, there was an English and logic test, as well as a company-standard résumé; I also had to bring a 104 résumé. Only after I arrived for the interview did they say that the manager had suddenly gone into a meeting, which was very disrespectful. I applied for position A but was interviewed for position B. Kiki said that they would notify me of the time for the second interview after the interview, but in reality, they broke their word and left me waiting for nothing.
Keeping people waiting and in uncertainty while disregarding their own responsibilities is not only disappointing, but also reflects shortcomings in the company’s management and a lack of basic respect and integrity toward job seekers.
1. Traditional-industry management style, with relatives and associates of influential people in the company.
2. The manager said that his department has an American-style culture.
3. The company encourages employees to propose business models that generate revenue; the maximum bonus is twice the employee’s base salary.
4. The interviewer said that employees are required to write work logs, which are reviewed weekly or periodically.
1. There wasn’t even a glass of water during the interview.
2. They sent the interview invitation on 104, then required me to handwrite a résumé at the interview without providing a pen, as well as complete an English test and an aptitude test.
3. The manager said that his management style is somewhat American, but he insists on having things his own way.
4. They never sent a rejection notice.