Sources and scope
This page collects workplace experiences, questions and discussions submitted by users. Dates shown are submission dates, not periods of employment. Individual reports do not describe the entire company.
Read the community guidelinesFree coffee
There are inexplicable points of frustration within the company. The environment in Taipei is terrible, and the Liu, Li, and Tai offices are all dirty.
Document and project management are also often confusing, making it difficult to figure out what is going on and leaving people extremely frustrated. They want to develop new features without investing manpower, leaving the people below scrambling. Today this is the standard, and not long afterward the standard changes again. Just dealing with these executives is exhausting enough to make you feel like a dog, and despite earning the least, you still have to take the blame.
The environment is good.
They send some materials for you to fill out in advance, and there is a short test on-site, which shortens the time spent filling out forms during the interview.
This company places great emphasis on formal qualifications, mainly asking whether you have relevant certifications. If you do not, they focus relentlessly on that point and completely disregard the interviewee’s previous experience.
It feels like a company belonging to the theoretical idealist camp. They also ask some very in-depth professional questions, so it is recommended that you do your homework before the interview.